Skip to content

Commit 275bb86

Browse files
committed
1414791, fixed Acrolinx BLOCKING ISSUES.
1 parent e1474e4 commit 275bb86

File tree

2 files changed

+3
-3
lines changed

2 files changed

+3
-3
lines changed

articles/app-service/web-sites-integrate-with-vnet.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -274,13 +274,13 @@ If those items don't answer your problems, look first for things like:
274274
**regional VNet Integration**
275275
* is your destination an RFC 1918 address
276276
* is there an NSG blocking egress from your integration subnet
277-
* if going across ExpressRoute or a VPN, is your on-premise gateway configured to route traffic back up to Azure? If you can reach endpoints in your VNet but not on-premises, this is good to check.
277+
* if going across ExpressRoute or a VPN, is your on-premises gateway configured to route traffic back up to Azure? If you can reach endpoints in your VNet but not on-premises, this is good to check.
278278

279279
**gateway required VNet Integration**
280280
* is the point-to-site address range in the RFC 1918 ranges (10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255 / 172.16.0.0-172.31.255.255 / 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255)?
281281
* Does the Gateway show as being up in the portal? If your gateway is down, then bring it back up.
282282
* Do certificates show as being in sync or do you suspect that the network configuration was changed? If your certificates are out of sync or you suspect that there has been a change made to your VNet configuration that wasn't synced with your ASPs, then hit "Sync Network".
283-
* if going across ExpressRoute or a VPN, is your on-premise gateway configured to route traffic back up to Azure? If you can reach endpoints in your VNet but not on-premises, this is good to check.
283+
* if going across ExpressRoute or a VPN, is your on-premises gateway configured to route traffic back up to Azure? If you can reach endpoints in your VNet but not on-premises, this is good to check.
284284

285285
Debugging networking issues is a challenge because there you cannot see what is blocking access to a specific host:port combination. Some of the causes include:
286286

articles/security/develop/threat-modeling-tool-communication-security.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ namespace CertificatePinningExample
298298
| **Applicable Technologies** | .NET Framework 3 |
299299
| **Attributes** | N/A |
300300
| **References** | [MSDN](https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ff650862.aspx) |
301-
| **Steps** | <ul><li>**EXPLANATION:** When Protection level is set to "none" it will disable message protection. Confidentiality and integrity is achieved with appropriate level of setting.</li><li>**RECOMMENDATIONS:**<ul><li>when `Mode=None` - Disables message protection</li><li>when `Mode=Sign` - Signs but does not encrypt the message; should be used when data integrity is important</li><li>when `Mode=EncryptAndSign` - Signs and encrypts the message</li></ul></li></ul><p>Consider turning off encryption and only signing your message when you just need to validate the integrity of the information without concerns of confidentiality. This may be useful for operations or service contracts in which you need to validate the original sender but no sensitive data is transmitted. When reducing the protection level, be careful that the message does not contain any personally identifiable information (PII).</p>|
301+
| **Steps** | <ul><li>**EXPLANATION:** When Protection level is set to "none" it will disable message protection. Confidentiality and integrity is achieved with appropriate level of setting.</li><li>**RECOMMENDATIONS:**<ul><li>when `Mode=None` - Disables message protection</li><li>when `Mode=Sign` - Signs but does not encrypt the message; should be used when data integrity is important</li><li>when `Mode=EncryptAndSign` - Signs and encrypts the message</li></ul></li></ul><p>Consider turning off encryption and only signing your message when you just need to validate the integrity of the information without concerns of confidentiality. This may be useful for operations or service contracts in which you need to validate the original sender but no sensitive data is transmitted. When reducing the protection level, be careful that the message does not contain any personal data.</p>|
302302

303303
### Example
304304
Configuring the service and the operation to only sign the message is shown in the following examples. Service Contract Example of `ProtectionLevel.Sign`: The following is an example of using ProtectionLevel.Sign at the Service Contract level:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)