Skip to content

Commit 2c8201c

Browse files
committed
reformat performance scope
1 parent c982315 commit 2c8201c

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-3
lines changed

articles/azure-netapp-files/performance-impact-kerberos.md

Lines changed: 7 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ ms.service: azure-netapp-files
1212
ms.workload: storage
1313
ms.tgt_pltfrm: na
1414
ms.topic: conceptual
15-
ms.date: 02/18/2021
15+
ms.date: 06/25/2021
1616
ms.author: anfdocs
1717
---
1818
# Performance impact of Kerberos on Azure NetApp Files NFSv4.1 volumes
1919

20-
Azure NetApp Files supports [NFS client encryption in Kerberos](configure-kerberos-encryption.md) modes (krb5, krb5i, and krb5p) with AES-256 encryption. This article describes the performance impact of Kerberos on NFSv4.1 volumes.
20+
Azure NetApp Files supports [NFS client encryption in Kerberos](configure-kerberos-encryption.md) modes (krb5, krb5i, and krb5p) with AES-256 encryption. This article describes the performance impact of Kerberos on NFSv4.1 volumes. **Performance comparisons referenced in this article are made against the `sec=sys` security parameter, testing on a single volume with a single client.**
2121

2222
## Available security options
2323

@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ This section describes the single client-side performance impact of the various
4040

4141
## Expected performance impact
4242

43-
There are two areas of focus: light load and upper limit. The following lists describe the performance impact security setting by security setting and scenario by scenario. All comparisons are made against the `sec=sys` security parameter. The test was done on a single volume, using a single client.
43+
There are two areas of focus: light load and upper limit. The following lists describe the performance impact security setting by security setting and scenario by scenario.
44+
45+
**Testing Scope**
46+
* All comparisons are made against the `sec=sys` security parameter.
47+
* The test was done on a single volume, using a single client.
4448

4549
Performance impact of krb5:
4650

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)