Skip to content

Commit 392cee0

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #178845 from azhar2005/rule_priority
[Appgw] Request routing rule needs to have unique priority value
2 parents 5882984 + f4ee4d3 commit 392cee0

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

articles/application-gateway/multiple-site-overview.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Similarly, you can host multiple subdomains of the same parent domain on the sam
2929
While using multi-site listeners, to ensure that the client traffic is routed to the accurate backend, it is important to have the request routing rules be present in the correct order.
3030
For example, if you have 2 listeners with associated Host name as `*.contoso.com` and `shop.contoso.com` respectively, the listener with the `shop.contoso.com` Host name would have to be processed before the listener with `*.contoso.com`. If the listener with `*.contoso.com` is processed first, then no client traffic would be received by the more specific `shop.contoso.com` listener.
3131

32-
This ordering can be established by providing a 'Priority' field value to the request routing rules associated with the listeners. You can specify an integer value from 1 to 20000 with 1 being the highest priority and 20000 being the lowest priority. In case the incoming client traffic matches with multiple listeners, the request routing rule with highest priority will be used for serving the request.
32+
This ordering can be established by providing a 'Priority' field value to the request routing rules associated with the listeners. You can specify an integer value from 1 to 20000 with 1 being the highest priority and 20000 being the lowest priority. In case the incoming client traffic matches with multiple listeners, the request routing rule with highest priority will be used for serving the request. Each request routing rule needs to have a unique priority value.
3333

3434
The priority field only impacts the order of evaluation of a request routing rule, this will not change the order of evaluation of path based rules within a `PathBasedRouting` request routing rule.
3535

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)