Skip to content

Commit 3e50beb

Browse files
committed
modified docs
1 parent aab78a3 commit 3e50beb

File tree

2 files changed

+4
-2
lines changed

2 files changed

+4
-2
lines changed

articles/expressroute/about-fastpath.md

Lines changed: 0 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ The following Azure services are supported:
117117
While ExpressRoute FastPath supports many configurations, it might not be suitable for all scenarios. The following limitations apply to ExpressRoute FastPath:
118118

119119
- **Azure Internal Load Balancer**: ExpressRoute FastPath doesn't support Azure internal load balancers or Azure PaaS services in spoke virtual networks. Network traffic from your on-premises network to the private IP addresses of these services in the spoke virtual network gets routed through the ExpressRoute virtual network gateway. Internal load balancers within the hub virtual network aren't affected.
120-
121-
- **Azure Virtual WAN ExpressRoute Gateway**: ExpressRoute FastPath isn't supported with [Azure Virtual WAN ExpressRoute Gateway](../virtual-wan/virtual-wan-expressroute-about.md).
122120

123121
- **Virtual network peering**:
124122

articles/route-server/troubleshoot-route-server.md

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ Yes, this is expected behavior. User-defined routes with next hop type **Virtual
4343

4444
If you advertise a route from your NVA to Route Server that is an exact prefix match as another user-defined route, then the advertised route's next hop must be valid. If the advertised next hop is a load balancer without a configured backend pool, then this invalid route will take precedence over the user-defined route. In your network interface's effective routes, the invalid advertised route will be displayed as a user-defined route with next hop type set to **None**.
4545

46+
### Why do I face connectivity issues after advertising Azure routes back into Azure?
47+
48+
If you plan to remove Azure BGP communities from VNet and UDR routes, do not advertise these routes back into Azure, as this will cause routing issues. As a result, it is not recommended to advertise Azure routes back into Azure.
49+
4650
### Why do I lose connectivity after associating a service endpoint policy to the RouteServerSubnet or GatewaySubnet?
4751

4852
If you associate a service endpoint policy to the RouteServerSubnet or GatewaySubnet, then communication may break between Azure's underlying management platform and these respective Azure services (Route Server and VPN/ExpressRoute gateway). This can cause these Azure resources to enter an unhealthy state, resulting in connectivity loss between your on-premises and Azure workloads.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)