Skip to content

Commit 483a87b

Browse files
author
julie.chen
committed
add article Performance Benchmarks for Linux
1 parent 7062e7b commit 483a87b

File tree

1 file changed

+6
-6
lines changed

1 file changed

+6
-6
lines changed

articles/azure-netapp-files/performance-benchmarks-linux.md

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -42,31 +42,31 @@ This graph illustrates decreases in 10% at a time, from pure read to pure write.
4242

4343
## Linux scale-up
4444

45-
Linux 5.3 kernel enables single-client scale-out networking for NFS `nconnect`. This feature is available on SUSE (starting with SLES12SP4) and Ubuntu (starting with the 19.10 release). It's similar in concept to both SMB multichannel and Oracle Direct NFS.
45+
Linux 5.3 kernel enables single-client scale-out networking for NFS-`nconnect`. The graphs in this section show the validation testing results for the client-side mount option with NFSv3. The feature is available on SUSE (starting with SLES12SP4) and Ubuntu (starting with the 19.10 release). It's similar in concept to both SMB multichannel and Oracle Direct NFS.
4646

47-
The graphs in this section show the results of validation testing for the client-side mount option with NFSv3. The graphs compare `nconnect` to a non-connected mounted volume. In the graphs, FIO generated the workload from a single D32s_v3 instance in the us-west2 Azure region.
47+
The graphs compare the advantages of `nconnect` to a non-connected mounted volume. In the graphs, FIO generated the workload from a single D32s_v3 instance in the us-west2 Azure region.
4848

4949
### Linux read throughput
5050

51-
The following graphs compare sequential reads of ~3,500 MiB/s of reads with `nconnect`, which is roughly 2.3X non-`nconnect`.
51+
The following graphs compare sequential reads of ~3,500 MiB/s reads with `nconnect`, which is roughly 2.3X non-`nconnect`.
5252

5353
![Linux read throughput](../media/azure-netapp-files/performance-benchmarks-linux-read-throughput.png)
5454

5555
### Linux write throughput
5656

57-
The following graphs show a comparison of sequential writes. They indicate that nconnect has no noticeable benefit for sequential writes. 1,500 MiB/s is roughly both the upper limit for the sequential write and the egress limit for D32s_v3 instance.
57+
The following graphs show sequential writes. They indicate that nconnect has no noticeable benefit for sequential writes. 1,500 MiB/s is roughly both the upper limit for the sequential write and the egress limit for D32s_v3 instance.
5858

5959
![Linux write throughput](../media/azure-netapp-files/performance-benchmarks-linux-write-throughput.png)
6060

6161
### Linux read IOPS
6262

63-
The following graphs show random reads of ~200,000 read IOPS with `nconnect`, which is roughly 3X non-`nconnect`.
63+
The following graphs show random reads of ~200,000 read IOPS with `nconnect`, roughly 3X non-`nconnect`.
6464

6565
![Linux read IOPS](../media/azure-netapp-files/performance-benchmarks-linux-read-iops.png)
6666

6767
### Linux write IOPS
6868

69-
The following graphs show random writes of ~135,000 write IOPS with `nconnect`, which is roughly 3X non-`nconnect`.
69+
The following graphs show random writes of ~135,000 write IOPS with `nconnect`, roughly 3X non-`nconnect`.
7070

7171
![Linux write IOPS](../media/azure-netapp-files/performance-benchmarks-linux-write-iops.png)
7272

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)