Skip to content

Commit 4bb7689

Browse files
committed
Learn Editor: Update lifecycle-management-policy-structure.md
1 parent 03471aa commit 4bb7689

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

articles/storage/blobs/lifecycle-management-policy-structure.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ When you enable access time tracking, a blob property called `LastAccessTime` is
124124

125125
If you apply the **daysAfterLastAccessTimeGreaterThan** run condition to a policy, then the `LastAccessTime` is used to determine whether that condition is met.
126126

127-
If you apply the **daysAfterLastAccessTimeGreaterThan** run condition to a policy, but you did not enable access time tracking, then the `LastAccessTime` is not used. The date the lifecycle policy was enabled is used instead. In fact, the date that the lifecycle policy was enabled is used in any situation where the `LastAccessTime` property of the blob is a null value. This can happen even if you've enable access time tracking in cases where a blob hasn't been accessed since tracking was enabled.
127+
If you apply the **daysAfterLastAccessTimeGreaterThan** run condition to a policy, but you did not enable access time tracking, then the `LastAccessTime` is not used. The date the last access tracking was enabled is used instead. In fact, the date that the last access tracking was enabled is used in any situation where the `LastAccessTime` property of the blob is a null value. This can happen even if you've enable access time tracking in cases where a blob hasn't been accessed since tracking was enabled.
128128

129129
> [!NOTE]
130130
> To minimize the effect on read access latency, only the first read of the last 24 hours updates the last access time. Subsequent reads in the same 24-hour period don't update the last access time. If a blob is modified between reads, the last access time is the more recent of the two values.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)