Skip to content

Commit 622f033

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #9513 from sandipsh/patch-1
Update policy-effects.md
2 parents 11cdfe6 + 6021c38 commit 622f033

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

articles/azure-policy/policy-effects.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -279,9 +279,9 @@ related resources to match and the template deployment to execute.
279279
- For _Subscription_, queries the entire subscription for the related resource.
280280
- Default is _ResourceGroup_.
281281
- **ExistenceCondition** (optional)
282-
- If not specified, any related resource of **type** satisfies the effect and does not trigger the audit.
282+
- If not specified, any related resource of **type** satisfies the effect and does not trigger the deployment.
283283
- Uses the same language as the policy rule for the **if** condition, but is evaluated against each related resource individually.
284-
- If any matching related resource evaluates to true, the effect is satisfied and does not trigger the audit.
284+
- If any matching related resource evaluates to true, the effect is satisfied and does not trigger the deployment.
285285
- Can use [field()] to check equivalence with values in the **if** condition.
286286
- As an example, this could be used to validate that the parent resource (in the **if** condition) is in the same resource location as the matching related resource.
287287
- **Deployment** [required]
@@ -347,4 +347,4 @@ not, then a deployment to enable it is executed.
347347

348348
Now that you have a deeper understanding of policy definition effects, review the policy samples:
349349

350-
- Review more examples at [Azure Policy samples](json-samples.md).
350+
- Review more examples at [Azure Policy samples](json-samples.md).

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)