Skip to content

Commit 7ed67d5

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #207144 from jamasten/patch-3
Added clarification to staging resource group
2 parents 7e553b3 + c7602d8 commit 7ed67d5

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

articles/virtual-machines/linux/image-builder-json.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ If the `stagingResourceGroup` field is not specified or specified with an empty
239239

240240
#### The stagingResourceGroup field is specified with a resource group that exists
241241

242-
If the `stagingResourceGroup` field is specified with a resource group that does exist, then the Image Builder service will check to make sure the resource group is empty (no resources inside), in the same region as the image template, and has either "Contributor" or "Owner" RBAC applied to the identity assigned to the Azure Image Builder image template resource. If any of the aforementioned requirements are not met an error will be thrown. The staging resource group will have the following tags added to it: `usedBy`, `imageTemplateName`, `imageTemplateResourceGroupName`. Preexisting tags are not deleted.
242+
If the `stagingResourceGroup` field is specified with a resource group that does exist, then the Image Builder service will check to make sure the resource group is not associated with another image template, is empty (no resources inside), in the same region as the image template, and has either "Contributor" or "Owner" RBAC applied to the identity assigned to the Azure Image Builder image template resource. If any of the aforementioned requirements are not met an error will be thrown. The staging resource group will have the following tags added to it: `usedBy`, `imageTemplateName`, `imageTemplateResourceGroupName`. Preexisting tags are not deleted.
243243

244244
#### The stagingResourceGroup field is specified with a resource group that DOES NOT exist
245245

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)