You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: articles/azure-monitor/autoscale/autoscale-overview.md
+3-9Lines changed: 3 additions & 9 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ For example, scale out your application by adding VMs when the average CPU usage
31
31
32
32
When the conditions in the rules are met, one or more autoscale actions are triggered, adding or removing VMs. You can also perform other actions like sending email, notifications, or webhooks to trigger processes in other systems.
33
33
34
-
## Scale out and scale up
34
+
## Horizontal vs. vertical scaling
35
35
36
-
Autoscale scales in and out, which is an increase or decrease of the number of resource instances. Scaling in and out is also called horizontal scaling. For example, for a virtual machine scale set, scaling out means adding more virtual machines. Scaling in means removing virtual machines. Horizontal scaling is flexible in a cloud situation because you can use it to run a large number of VMs to handle load.
36
+
Autoscale scales in and out, or horizontally. Scaling horizontally is an increase or decrease of the number of resource instances. For example, for a virtual machine scale set, scaling out means adding more virtual machines. Scaling in means removing virtual machines. Horizontal scaling is flexible in a cloud situation because you can use it to run a large number of VMs to handle load.
37
37
38
-
In contrast, scaling up and down, or vertical scaling, keeps the number of resources constant but gives those resources more capacity in terms of memory, CPU speed, disk space, and network. Vertical scaling is limited by the availability of larger hardware, which eventually reaches an upper limit. Hardware size availability varies in Azure by region. Vertical scaling might also require a restart of the virtual machine during the scaling process.
38
+
In contrast, scaling up and down, or vertical scaling, keeps the same number of resource instances constant but gives them more capacity in terms of memory, CPU speed, disk space, and network. Vertical scaling is limited by the availability of larger hardware, which eventually reaches an upper limit. Hardware size availability varies in Azure by region. Vertical scaling might also require a restart of the VM during the scaling process. Autoscale does not support vertical scaling.
39
39
40
40
:::image type="content" source="./media/autoscale-overview/vertical-scaling.png" alt-text="A diagram that shows scaling up by adding CPU and memory to a virtual machine.":::
41
41
@@ -119,12 +119,6 @@ For code examples, see:
119
119
*[Tutorial: Automatically scale a virtual machine scale set with the Azure CLI](../../virtual-machine-scale-sets/tutorial-autoscale-cli.md)
120
120
*[Tutorial: Automatically scale a virtual machine scale set with an Azure template](../../virtual-machine-scale-sets/tutorial-autoscale-powershell.md)
121
121
122
-
## Horizontal vs. vertical scaling
123
-
124
-
Autoscale scales horizontally, which is an increase or decrease of the number of resource instances. For example, in a virtual machine scale set, scaling out means adding more virtual machines. Scaling in means removing VMs. Horizontal scaling is flexible in a cloud situation because it allows you to run a large number of VMs to handle load.
125
-
126
-
In contrast, vertical scaling keeps the same number of resources constant but gives them more capacity in terms of memory, CPU speed, disk space, and network. Adding or removing capacity in vertical scaling is known as scaling down. Vertical scaling is limited by the availability of larger hardware, which eventually reaches an upper limit. Hardware size availability varies in Azure by region. Vertical scaling might also require a restart of the VM during the scaling process.
0 commit comments