You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: articles/migrate/how-to-view-a-business-case.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ This section contains the cost estimate by recommended target (Annual cost and a
125
125
-**Compute and license cost**: This card shows the comparison of compute and license cost when using Azure hybrid benefit and without Azure hybrid benefit.
126
126
-**Savings** - This card displays the estimated maximum savings when using Azure hybrid benefit and with extended security updates over a period of one year.
127
127
- Azure SQL:
128
-
-**Estimated cost by savings options**: This card includes compute cost for Azure SQL MI. It is recommended that all idle SQL instances are migrated via Pay as you go Dev/Test and others (Active and unknown) are migrated using 3 year Reserved Instance to maximize savings.
128
+
-**Estimated cost by savings options**: This card includes compute cost for Azure SQL MI. It's recommended that all idle SQL instances are migrated via Pay as you go Dev/Test and others (Active and unknown) are migrated using 3 year Reserved Instance to maximize savings.
129
129
-**Distribution by recommended service tier** : This card covers the recommended service tier.
130
130
- Azure App Service and App Service Container:
131
-
-**Estimated cost by savings options**: This card includes Azure App Service Plans cost. It is recommended that the web apps are migrated using 3 year Reserved Instance or 3 year Savings Plan to maximize savings.
131
+
-**Estimated cost by savings options**: This card includes Azure App Service Plans cost. It's recommended that the web apps are migrated using 3 year Reserved Instance or 3 year Savings Plan to maximize savings.
132
132
-**Distribution by recommended plans** : This card covers the recommended App Service plan.
133
133
- Azure Kubernetes Service:
134
-
-**Estimated cost by savings options**: This card includes the cost of the recommended AKS node pools. It is recommended that the web apps are migrated using 3 year Reserved Instance or 3 year Savings Plan to maximize savings.
134
+
-**Estimated cost by savings options**: This card includes the cost of the recommended AKS node pools. It's recommended that the web apps are migrated using 3 year Reserved Instance or 3 year Savings Plan to maximize savings.
135
135
-**Distribution by recommended Node pool SKU**: This card covers the recommended SKUs for AKS node pools.
136
136
137
137
#### [On-premises](#tab/paas-on-premises)
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ This section contains the cost estimate by recommended target (Annual cost and a
145
145
146
146
## On-premises vs AVS report
147
147
It covers cost components for on-premises and AVS, savings, and insights to understand the savings better.
148
-
:::image type="content" source="./media/how-to-view-a-business-case/comparison-avs-inline.png" alt-text="Screenshot of on-premises and Azure comparison." lightbox="./media/how-to-view-a-business-case/comparison-avs-expanded.png":::
148
+
:::image type="content" source="./media/how-to-view-a-business-case/comparison-avs-inline.png" alt-text="Screenshot of on-premises and AVS comparison." lightbox="./media/how-to-view-a-business-case/comparison-avs-expanded.png":::
0 commit comments