Merge pull request #96480 from erisnar/patch-1

Add missing space after comma

Author: Jak-MS

articles/virtual-network/virtual-network-scenario-udr-gw-nva.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ A common scenario among larger Azure customer is the need to provide a two-tiere
 * All traffic going to the application server must go through a firewall virtual appliance. This virtual appliance will be used for access to the backend end server, and access coming in from the on-premises network via a VPN Gateway.
 * Administrators must be able to manage the firewall virtual appliances from their on-premises computers, by using a third firewall virtual appliance used exclusively for management purposes.
 
-This is a standard perimeter network (also knowns as DMZ) scenario with a DMZ and a protected network. Such scenario can be constructed in Azure by using NSGs,firewall virtual appliances, or a combination of both. The table below shows some of the pros and cons between NSGs and firewall virtual appliances.
+This is a standard perimeter network (also knowns as DMZ) scenario with a DMZ and a protected network. Such scenario can be constructed in Azure by using NSGs, firewall virtual appliances, or a combination of both. The table below shows some of the pros and cons between NSGs and firewall virtual appliances.
 
 |  | Pros | Cons |
 | --- | --- | --- |