Skip to content

Commit ba59979

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #92218 from alexkarcher-msft/master
Clarifying Premium Billing
2 parents 0f9d5ae + 3bb3036 commit ba59979

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-1
lines changed

articles/azure-functions/functions-scale.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ When you're using the Premium plan, instances of the Azure Functions host are ad
7474

7575
Information on how you can configure these options can be found in the [Azure Functions premium plan document](functions-premium-plan.md).
7676

77-
Instead of billing per execution and memory consumed, billing for the Premium plan is based on the number of core seconds, execution time, and memory used across needed and reserved instances. At least one instance must be warm at all times. This means that there is a fixed monthly cost per active plan, regardless of the number of executions.
77+
Instead of billing per execution and memory consumed, billing for the Premium plan is based on the number of core seconds and memory used across needed and pre-warmed instances. At least one instance must be warm at all times per plan. This means that there is a minimum monthly cost per active plan, regardless of the number of executions. Keep in mind that all function apps in a Premium plan share pre-warmed and active instances.
7878

7979
Consider the Azure Functions premium plan in the following situations:
8080

8181
* Your function apps run continuously, or nearly continuously.
82+
* You have a high number of small executions and have a high execution bill but low GB second bill in the consumption plan.
8283
* You need more CPU or memory options than what is provided by the Consumption plan.
8384
* Your code needs to run longer than the [maximum execution time allowed](#timeout) on the Consumption plan.
8485
* You require features that are only available on a Premium plan, such as VNET/VPN connectivity.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)