Skip to content

Commit bc1d492

Browse files
authored
typo fixed
1 parent cb07717 commit bc1d492

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

articles/route-server/vmware-solution-default-route.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ If both ExpressRoute circuits (to AVS and to on-premises) are terminated in the
3737

3838
As the diagram shows, the NVA needs to advertise a more generic (less specific) prefix that both the on-premises network and AVS. You need to be careful with this approach, since the NVA might be potentially attracting traffic that it should not (since it is advertising wider ranges, in the example above the whole `10.0.0.0/8` network).
3939

40-
If two regions are involved, you would need an NVA would in each region, and both NVAs would exchange the routes they learn from their respective Azure Route Servers via BGP and some sort of encapsulation protocol such as VXLAN or IPsec, as the following diagram shows.
40+
If two regions are involved, you would need an NVA in each region, and both NVAs would exchange the routes they learn from their respective Azure Route Servers via BGP and some sort of encapsulation protocol such as VXLAN or IPsec, as the following diagram shows.
4141

4242
:::image type="content" source="./media/scenarios/vmware-solution-to-on-premises.png" alt-text="Diagram of AVS to on-premises communication with Route Server in two regions.":::
4343

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)