@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ms.service: azure-netapp-files
12
12
ms.workload : storage
13
13
ms.tgt_pltfrm : na
14
14
ms.topic : conceptual
15
- ms.date : 07/12/2022
15
+ ms.date : 06/25/2021
16
16
ms.author : anfdocs
17
17
---
18
18
# Performance impact of Kerberos on Azure NetApp Files NFSv4.1 volumes
@@ -46,8 +46,20 @@ There are two areas of focus: light load and upper limit. The following lists de
46
46
* All comparisons are made against the ` sec=sys ` security parameter.
47
47
* The test was done on a single volume, using a single client.
48
48
49
+ <!-- sys baseline of -
50
+ Avg. IOPS: ~241102
51
+ Avg. throughput: ~753 MB/s
52
+ Avg. latency ~0.5 ms
53
+ ->
54
+
49
55
**Performance impact of krb5:**
50
56
57
+ <!--
58
+ Average IOPS: ~11351 / -53%
59
+ Average throughput: ~355 MB/s / -53%
60
+ Average latency: ~3.2 ms / +540%
61
+ -->
62
+
51
63
* Low concurrency (r/w):
52
64
* Sequential latency increased 0.3 ms.
53
65
* Random I/O latency increased 0.2 ms.
@@ -59,6 +71,12 @@ There are two areas of focus: light load and upper limit. The following lists de
59
71
60
72
** Performance impact of krb5i:**
61
73
74
+ <!--
75
+ Average IOPS: ~10856 / -55%
76
+ Average throughput: ~338 MB/s / -55%
77
+ Average latency: ~1.1 ms / +120%
78
+ -->
79
+
62
80
* Low concurrency (r/w):
63
81
* Sequential latency increased 0.5 ms.
64
82
* Random I/O latency increased 0.2 ms.
@@ -70,6 +88,12 @@ There are two areas of focus: light load and upper limit. The following lists de
70
88
71
89
** Performance impact of krb5p:**
72
90
91
+ <!--
92
+ Average IOPS: ~5579 / -77%
93
+ Average throughput: ~174 MB/s / -77%
94
+ Average latency: ~2.1 ms / +320%
95
+ -->
96
+
73
97
* Low concurrency (r/w):
74
98
* Sequential latency increased 0.8 ms.
75
99
* Random I/O latency increased 0.2 ms.
0 commit comments