Skip to content

Conversation

@brianveldman
Copy link
Contributor

Removed the double kusto reference

Removed the double kusto reference
@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit ae5dc4e:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
unified-secops-platform/mto-advanced-hunting.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 8d1271a:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
unified-secops-platform/mto-advanced-hunting.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@poliveria poliveria merged commit 960d992 into MicrosoftDocs:public Oct 28, 2025
7 checks passed
@garycentric
Copy link
Contributor

garycentric commented Oct 28, 2025

@brianveldman @poliveria In PR review, we've reverted the changes in this PR, which removed the opening set of backticks from a code block, removing the code formatting and leaving the closing set of backticks to be rendered as characters in the web page. Also, this PR removed the code label from the code block. From the description of the commit in this pull request, it seems like you'd prefer to not label successive code blocks that are of the same content type, but our style guidelines are to label every code block. Correctly identifying the content in a code block also determines color-coding of content.

@poliveria
Copy link
Contributor

@brianveldman @garycentric no worries. i recreated the request in the separate PR and it's been merged to live so we can disregard this.

the request was to separate two code blocks, and this has been reflected in the live page. thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants