You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: 03-stats.Rmd
+4-1Lines changed: 4 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -132,23 +132,26 @@ You can adjust various factors and see their effect on the enrichment p-values.
132
132
#### {-}
133
133
134
134
### **Questions** {- .rationale}
135
-
1. Is it significant at p=0.05?
135
+
1.If 24 of the 300 differentially expressed genes are annotated with the 500-gene term of interest. Is it significant at p=0.05?
136
136
<details>
137
137
<summary>Show</summary>
138
138
No, corrected pval=0.087
139
139
</details>
140
+
<p> </p> <!-- insert blank line -->
140
141
141
142
2. What about with a smaller background of 5000 genes (e.g. proteomic datasets)?
142
143
<details>
143
144
<summary>Show</summary>
144
145
Even less so - corrected pval=1
145
146
</details>
147
+
<p> </p> <!-- insert blank line -->
146
148
147
149
3. Or, testing against a smaller database of terms; 2000 terms instead of 10000? With the original 16000 gene background.
148
150
<details>
149
151
<summary>Show</summary>
150
152
Yes, now corrected pval=0.017
151
153
</details>
154
+
<p> </p> <!-- insert blank line -->
152
155
153
156
4. 19 out of 200 differentially expressed genes (9.5%), need to hit for a 500-gene term (3.1% of all genes) to be significant at (p=0.048). How many hits would be needed for a more specific 30-gene term?
0 commit comments