minor changes in pooling

Author: nkandhari

02-02-ExperimentFactors.Rmd

@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ Technical replicates help assess the consistency of the sequencing process and r
 
 Sample pooling in RNA-Seq is used by experimental biologists to reduce costs and increase throughput, particularly when RNA input is low. While pooling offers practical benefits, it also introduces pitfalls that can negatively affect data quality and the conclusions drawn from the experiment. Some of the key challenges include [(Rajkumar, A.P. et al, Experimental validation of methods for differential gene expression analysis and sample pooling in RNA-seq. 2015)](https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-015-1767-y):
 
-* Pooling collapses multiple biological samples into one. The ability to estimate biological variability is lost, which is essential for differential expression analysis. This may result in high false positivity rate.
+* Pooling collapses multiple biological samples into one losing the ability to estimate biological variability.
+* Pooling averages out differences between samples, which can mask important biological signals. It can lead to loss of biologically meaningful heterogeneity.
 * Pooling decreases the statistical power and ability to estimate within population variation.
-* Pooling averages out differences between samples, which can mask important biological signals. It leads to loss of biologically meaningful heterogeneity.
 * Unequal amounts of RNA pooled from each sample can result in disproportionate representation, potentially skewing the data.
 * An outlier among pooled samples can skew the average expression values and introduce bias. 
 * If different pools of samples are processed, prepared, or sequenced in separate batches, this can lead to batch effects. It is impossible to correct for batch effect if the barcodes are absent or corrupted or poorly designed.
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ In case of a big experiment with multiple cages, measuring and monitoring enviro
 
 In conclusion, designing a robust RNA-Seq experiment requires thoughtful consideration of various factors to ensure accurate and meaningful results. From selecting the appropriate sample sources to determining the necessary sequencing depth (typically 10 to 20 million reads per sample for a standard gene expression analysis), every decision influences the quality of the data and the validity of the conclusions drawn. The inclusion of biological replicates is essential for capturing natural variability, while technical replicates help control for experimental errors. As a general rule for a standard RNA-Seq experiment, **at least three biological replicates** should be included, though it is ideal to have more to increase statistical power.
 
-Attention must also be paid to potential sources of unwanted variation, such as batch effects and confounding factors, which can obscure true biological signals. These challenges can be mitigated through careful planning, including randomization, pooling strategies, and advanced statistical modeling. Addressing these variables not only enhances the reliability of the experiment but also enables a more accurate interpretation of gene expression differences, leading to more valid biological insights. We'll discuss more about the experimental and statistical strategies in the next sections. Ultimately, a well-balanced experimental design is crucial for the success of RNA-Seq studies and for generating reproducible and insightful data.
+Attention must also be paid to potential sources of unwanted variation, such as batch effects and confounding factors, which can obscure true biological signals. These challenges can be mitigated through careful planning, including randomization, and advanced statistical modeling. Addressing these variables not only enhances the reliability of the experiment but also enables a more accurate interpretation of gene expression differences, leading to more valid biological insights. We'll discuss more about the experimental and statistical strategies in the next sections. Ultimately, a well-balanced experimental design is crucial for the success of RNA-Seq studies and for generating reproducible and insightful data.
 
 
 ```{r, echo=FALSE, fig.align="center", fig.cap ="Summary: Factors affecting the outcome of an RNA-Seq experiment ([source](https://www.amazon.com/Experimental-Design-Laboratory-Biologists-Reproducibility/dp/1107424887)).", out.width="700px", out.height="200px"}