Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@andybeet I think the package should include data that is going to make our jobs easier. If it is going to be helpful for you, I vote include it. I think the documentation suggestion works - maybe include a POC from DMF if that person is comfortable with it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Yeah, I agree with @kimberly-bastille. If it's useful to your workflow, I think it could be included. For documentation, it might be good to have a generic email to Mass DMF (or a specific POC like @kimberly-bastille said) that way if a user has questions they can reach out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been passed an official shapefile from mass.gov depicting the mass inshore survey strata.
We use this in our State of the Ecosystem reporting and it would be beneficial to have this in NEFSCspatial.
However it is not online anywhere and we can't point to it as a reference, directly. Only to a description of the survey
Is this something we are willing to add to the package? Maybe in the documentation state something like "Division of Marine Fisheries - New Bedford Office"
Would like your thoughts @jmhatch @kimberly-bastille
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions