carrousel edits NL EN

Author: jfparie

content/.DS_Store

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 intro: >-
-  More than 1.245 algorithms have already been published by 289 organisations in the Dutch Algorithm Register. But how informative is the information that’s currently provided? 
+  More than 1.245 algorithms have already been published by 289 organisations in the Dutch Algorithm Register. But how informative are the registrations? 
 featured: true
 layout: article
 type: knowledgebase_item
@@ -17,25 +17,26 @@ title: 'Analysis Dutch Algorithmm Register'
 subtitle: ''
 image: /images/knowledge_base/Analysis Dutch Algorithm Register.png
 search:
-  searchableText: analysis, register
+  searchableText: analysis, register, algorithm register
 ---
 
-#### Analysis Dutch Algorithm Register
-
-Algorithm Register: from pinnacle of transparency to puzzle of paperwork 
+#### Algorithm Register: from pinnacle of transparency to puzzle of paperwork 
 
 More than 1.245 algorithms have already been published by 289 organisations in the Dutch Algorithm Register. But how informative is the information that’s currently provided? 
 
 We analysed the current state of the Algorithm Register. The key takeaways are explained in the carousel below ⬇️ 
 
 We identify three solutions to strengthen trust in Dutch government algorithms by improving the type and quality of registered information: 
 
-1. Develop vertical standards 
+1. **Develop vertical standards:** Develop technology-specific requirements – such as accuracy specifications for facial recognition software – that can be requested during procurement and can be published in the Algorithm Register.
+
+2. **Make some categories mandatory for publication:** Require high-risk AI systems and highimpact algorithms to publish, at least, their legal basis and an identification of
+risks.
 
-2. Make some categories mandatory for publication 
+3. **Develop national guidelines for complete and consistent classification:** National guidelines are needed to ensure accurate and consistent identification and risk classification across organisations.
 
-3. Develop national guidelines for complete and consistent classification 
+👩🏼‍💻 The code for the analysis can be found open source in <a href="https://github.com/NGO-Algorithm-Audit/Algorithm-Register-Analysis" target="_blank">GitHub</a>.
 
-👩🏼‍💻 The code for the analysis can be found open source in [Github](https://github.com/NGO-Algorithm-Audit/Algorithm-Register-Analysis).
+09-12-2025
 
 {{< embed_pdf url="/pdf-files/knowledge-base/20251205 Algorithm Register carrousel.pdf" width_mobile_pdf="12" width_desktop_pdf="6" >}}

content/english/knowledge-platform/knowledge-base/Analysis_Dutch_Algorithm_Register.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+---
+intro: >-
+  More than 1.245 algorithms have already been published by 289 organisations in the Dutch Algorithm Register. But how informative are the registrations? 
+featured: true
+layout: article
+type: knowledgebase_item
+facets:
+  - value: type_analysis
+    label: Analysis
+  - value: subject_AIAct
+    label: AI Act
+author: Algorithm Audit
+summary: >-
+  Algorithm Register: from pinnacle of transparency to puzzle of paperwork  
+weight: -16
+title: 'Analysis Dutch Algorithmm Register'
+subtitle: ''
+image: /images/knowledge_base/Analysis Dutch Algorithm Register.png
+search:
+  searchableText: analysis, register, algorithm register
+---
+
+#### Algoritmeregister: van toonbeeld van transparantie tot puzzel van papierwerk
+
+Meer dan 1.245 algoritmen zijn inmiddels gepubliceerd door 289 organisaties in het Nederlandse Algoritmeregister. Maar hoe informatief is de informatie die wordt gedeeld?
+
+We hebben het huidige Algoritmeregister geanalyseerd. De belangrijkste conclusies zijn samengevat in onderstaande carrousel ⬇️
+
+We stellen drie oplossingen voor om de kwaliteit van de geregistreerde informatie te verbeteren en daarmee het vertrouwen in algoritmes van de Nederlandse overheid te herstellen:
+
+1. **Ontwikkel verticale standaarden:** Ontwikkel technologie-specifieke eisen, bijvoorbeeld nauwkeurigheidsspecificaties voor gezichtsherkenningssoftware, die bij aanbestedingen opgevraagd kunnen worden en in het Algoritmeregister gepubliceerd kunnen worden.
+2. **Maak sommige categorieën verplicht te publiceren:** Verplicht hoogrisico-AI-systemen en impactvolle algoritmen om ten minste de wettelijke basis en weging van geïdentificeerde risico’s te publiceren.
+3. **Ontwikkel nationale richtlijnen voor volledige en consistente classificatie:** Nationale richtlijnen zijn nodig om een nauwkeurige en consistente identificatie en risicoclassificatie tussen organisaties te waarborgen.
+
+👩🏼‍💻 De code voor de analyse is open source te vinden op <a href="https://github.com/NGO-Algorithm-Audit/Algorithm-Register-Analysis" target="_blank">GitHub</a>.
+
+09-12-2025
+
+{{< embed_pdf url="/pdf-files/knowledge-base/20251205 Algorithm Register carrousel.pdf" width_mobile_pdf="12" width_desktop_pdf="6" >}}