You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The outcomes of the first questionnaire are displayed in the below figure. The following categories are distinguished:
37
37
38
38
- Algorithms: fall outside the scope of the AI Act, no additional control measures are needed.
39
-
- Impactful algorithms: fall outside the scope of the AI Act, additional control measures are needed.
39
+
- Impactful algorithms: fall outside the scope of the AI Act, additional control measures are needed.
40
40
- AI systems: are in scope of the AI Act, only additional control measures are needed in case of high-risk AI systems.
41
41
- High risk AI systems: are in scope of the AI Act, additional control measures for high-risk AI systems are needed through harmonized standards.
42
42
- Prohibited AI systems: are in scope of the AI Act, usage of this type of AI systems is prohibited in the European Union. More information about this category is provided by the <ahref="https://www.digitaleoverheid.nl/achtergrondartikelen/welke-ai-praktijken-zijn-volgend-jaar-verboden/"target="_blank">Dutch government</a>.
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The questions in the AI Act Implementation Tool are developed in collaboration w
51
51
52
52
{{< container_close >}}
53
53
54
-
{{< container_open icon="far fa-file" title="Guidelines for AI Act implementation" id="documentation-definition" >}}
54
+
{{< container_open icon="far fa-file" title="Guidelines for AI Act implementation" id="documentation-definition" >}}
55
55
56
56
The reasoning and motivations behind the selected questions in the AI Act Implementation Tool are outlined in the below documents.
57
57
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ The reasoning and motivations behind the selected questions in the AI Act Implem
0 commit comments