|
| 1 | +import type { SQSEvent, SQSRecord } from 'aws-lambda'; |
| 2 | +import { mock } from 'jest-mock-extended'; |
| 3 | +import { Logger, Sender } from 'utils'; |
| 4 | +import { PDMResourceAvailable } from 'digital-letters-events'; |
| 5 | +import { NotifyMessageProcessor } from 'app/notify-message-processor'; |
| 6 | +import { SenderManagement } from 'sender-management'; |
| 7 | +import { EventPublisherFacade } from 'infra/event-publisher-facade'; |
| 8 | +import { createHandler, SqsHandlerDependencies } from 'apis/sqs-handler'; |
| 9 | +import { parseSqsRecord } from 'app/parse-sqs-message'; |
| 10 | +import { InvalidPdmResourceAvailableEvent } from 'domain/invalid-pdm-resource-available-event'; |
| 11 | +import { RequestNotifyError } from 'domain/request-notify-error'; |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +jest.mock('app/parse-sqs-message'); |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +const mockLogger = mock<Logger>(); |
| 16 | +const mockNotifyMessageProcessor = mock<NotifyMessageProcessor>(); |
| 17 | +const mockSenderManagement = mock<SenderManagement>(); |
| 18 | +const mockEventPublisherFacade = mock<EventPublisherFacade>(); |
| 19 | +const mockParseSqsRecord = jest.mocked(parseSqsRecord); |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +describe('createHandler', () => { |
| 22 | + const dependencies: SqsHandlerDependencies = { |
| 23 | + logger: mockLogger, |
| 24 | + notifyMessageProcessor: mockNotifyMessageProcessor, |
| 25 | + senderManagement: mockSenderManagement, |
| 26 | + eventPublisherFacade: mockEventPublisherFacade, |
| 27 | + }; |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + const senderId = 'sender-123'; |
| 30 | + const routingConfigId = 'routing-config-123'; |
| 31 | + const messageReference = 'msg-ref-123'; |
| 32 | + const notifyId = 'notify-id-123'; |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | + const mockSender: Sender = { |
| 35 | + senderId, |
| 36 | + routingConfigId, |
| 37 | + displayName: 'Test Sender', |
| 38 | + clientId: 'client-123', |
| 39 | + campaignId: 'campaign-123', |
| 40 | + }; |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + const mockPdmEvent: PDMResourceAvailable = { |
| 43 | + id: 'event-id-123', |
| 44 | + source: 'urn:nhs:names:services:notify:pdm', |
| 45 | + specversion: '1.0', |
| 46 | + type: 'uk.nhs.notify.pdm.resource.available', |
| 47 | + time: '2025-12-15T10:00:00Z', |
| 48 | + datacontenttype: 'application/json', |
| 49 | + data: { |
| 50 | + senderId, |
| 51 | + messageReference, |
| 52 | + resourceType: 'letter', |
| 53 | + resourceLocation: 's3://bucket/key', |
| 54 | + }, |
| 55 | + }; |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + const createSqsRecord = (messageId: string): SQSRecord => ({ |
| 58 | + messageId, |
| 59 | + receiptHandle: 'receipt-handle', |
| 60 | + body: JSON.stringify({ |
| 61 | + detail: mockPdmEvent, |
| 62 | + }), |
| 63 | + attributes: { |
| 64 | + ApproximateReceiveCount: '1', |
| 65 | + SentTimestamp: '1234567890', |
| 66 | + SenderId: 'sender-id', |
| 67 | + ApproximateFirstReceiveTimestamp: '1234567890', |
| 68 | + }, |
| 69 | + messageAttributes: {}, |
| 70 | + md5OfBody: 'md5', |
| 71 | + eventSource: 'aws:sqs', |
| 72 | + eventSourceARN: 'arn:aws:sqs:region:account:queue', |
| 73 | + awsRegion: 'eu-west-2', |
| 74 | + }); |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + const createSqsEvent = (recordCount: number): SQSEvent => ({ |
| 77 | + Records: Array.from({ length: recordCount }, (_, i) => |
| 78 | + createSqsRecord(`message-id-${i + 1}`), |
| 79 | + ), |
| 80 | + }); |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + beforeEach(() => { |
| 83 | + jest.clearAllMocks(); |
| 84 | + }); |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | + describe('when processing a single successful SQS record', () => { |
| 87 | + it('processes the message and returns no batch item failures', async () => { |
| 88 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(1); |
| 89 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent); |
| 92 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValueOnce(mockSender); |
| 93 | + mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process.mockResolvedValueOnce(notifyId); |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + expect(result).toEqual({ batchItemFailures: [] }); |
| 98 | + expect(mockLogger.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 99 | + 'Received SQS Event of 1 record(s)', |
| 100 | + ); |
| 101 | + expect(mockLogger.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 102 | + '1 of 1 records processed successfully', |
| 103 | + ); |
| 104 | + expect(mockParseSqsRecord).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 105 | + sqsEvent.Records[0], |
| 106 | + mockLogger, |
| 107 | + ); |
| 108 | + expect(mockSenderManagement.getSender).toHaveBeenCalledWith(senderId); |
| 109 | + expect(mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 110 | + expect( |
| 111 | + mockEventPublisherFacade.publishMessageRequestSubmitted, |
| 112 | + ).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 113 | + }); |
| 114 | + }); |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + describe('when sender has no routing config', () => { |
| 117 | + it('skips the message and publishes a skipped event', async () => { |
| 118 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(1); |
| 119 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 120 | + const senderWithoutRouting: Sender = { |
| 121 | + ...mockSender, |
| 122 | + routingConfigId: undefined, |
| 123 | + }; |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent); |
| 126 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValueOnce(senderWithoutRouting); |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | + expect(result).toEqual({ batchItemFailures: [] }); |
| 131 | + expect(mockLogger.debug).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 132 | + `No routing config for sender ${senderId}, skipping message`, |
| 133 | + ); |
| 134 | + expect(mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| 135 | + expect( |
| 136 | + mockEventPublisherFacade.publishMessageRequestSkipped, |
| 137 | + ).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 138 | + }); |
| 139 | + }); |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | + describe('when processing multiple SQS records', () => { |
| 142 | + it('processes all records successfully', async () => { |
| 143 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(3); |
| 144 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockReturnValue(mockPdmEvent); |
| 147 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValue(mockSender); |
| 148 | + mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process.mockResolvedValue(notifyId); |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + expect(result).toEqual({ batchItemFailures: [] }); |
| 153 | + expect(mockLogger.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 154 | + 'Received SQS Event of 3 record(s)', |
| 155 | + ); |
| 156 | + expect(mockLogger.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 157 | + '3 of 3 records processed successfully', |
| 158 | + ); |
| 159 | + expect(mockParseSqsRecord).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3); |
| 160 | + expect(mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3); |
| 161 | + }); |
| 162 | + }); |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | + describe('when parseSqsRecord throws InvalidPdmResourceAvailableEvent', () => { |
| 165 | + it('marks the message as failed for retry', async () => { |
| 166 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(1); |
| 167 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 168 | + const messageId = sqsEvent.Records[0].messageId; |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockImplementationOnce(() => { |
| 171 | + throw new InvalidPdmResourceAvailableEvent(messageId); |
| 172 | + }); |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | + expect(result).toEqual({ |
| 177 | + batchItemFailures: [{ itemIdentifier: messageId }], |
| 178 | + }); |
| 179 | + expect(mockLogger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ |
| 180 | + error: 'Unable to parse PDMResourceAvailable event from SQS message', |
| 181 | + description: 'Failed processing message', |
| 182 | + messageId, |
| 183 | + }); |
| 184 | + expect(mockLogger.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 185 | + '0 of 1 records processed successfully', |
| 186 | + ); |
| 187 | + }); |
| 188 | + }); |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | + describe('when processing throws RequestNotifyError', () => { |
| 191 | + it('marks the message as failed for retry since error lacks messageReference', async () => { |
| 192 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(1); |
| 193 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 194 | + const messageId = sqsEvent.Records[0].messageId; |
| 195 | + const errorCode = 'VALIDATION_ERROR'; |
| 196 | + const correlationId = 'corr-123'; |
| 197 | + const error = new RequestNotifyError( |
| 198 | + new Error('Validation failed'), |
| 199 | + correlationId, |
| 200 | + errorCode, |
| 201 | + ); |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent); |
| 204 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValueOnce(mockSender); |
| 205 | + mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process.mockRejectedValueOnce(error); |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | + // Since RequestNotifyError doesn't have messageReference property, |
| 210 | + // it falls through to the else branch and is treated as a transient error |
| 211 | + expect(result).toEqual({ |
| 212 | + batchItemFailures: [{ itemIdentifier: messageId }], |
| 213 | + }); |
| 214 | + expect(mockLogger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ |
| 215 | + error: error.message, |
| 216 | + description: 'Failed processing message', |
| 217 | + messageId, |
| 218 | + }); |
| 219 | + expect( |
| 220 | + mockEventPublisherFacade.publishMessageRequestRejected, |
| 221 | + ).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| 222 | + }); |
| 223 | + }); |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | + describe('when processing throws a generic error', () => { |
| 226 | + it('marks the message as failed for retry', async () => { |
| 227 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(1); |
| 228 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 229 | + const messageId = sqsEvent.Records[0].messageId; |
| 230 | + const error = new Error('Unexpected error'); |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent); |
| 233 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValueOnce(mockSender); |
| 234 | + mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process.mockRejectedValueOnce(error); |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | + expect(result).toEqual({ |
| 239 | + batchItemFailures: [{ itemIdentifier: messageId }], |
| 240 | + }); |
| 241 | + expect(mockLogger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ |
| 242 | + error: error.message, |
| 243 | + description: 'Failed processing message', |
| 244 | + messageId, |
| 245 | + }); |
| 246 | + expect( |
| 247 | + mockEventPublisherFacade.publishMessageRequestRejected, |
| 248 | + ).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| 249 | + }); |
| 250 | + }); |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | + describe('when processing mixed success and failure records', () => { |
| 253 | + it('returns only failed message IDs', async () => { |
| 254 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(3); |
| 255 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | + mockParseSqsRecord |
| 258 | + .mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent) |
| 259 | + .mockImplementationOnce(() => { |
| 260 | + throw new Error('Parse error'); |
| 261 | + }) |
| 262 | + .mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent); |
| 263 | + |
| 264 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValue(mockSender); |
| 265 | + mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process.mockResolvedValue(notifyId); |
| 266 | + |
| 267 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 268 | + |
| 269 | + expect(result).toEqual({ |
| 270 | + batchItemFailures: [{ itemIdentifier: 'message-id-2' }], |
| 271 | + }); |
| 272 | + expect(mockLogger.info).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 273 | + '2 of 3 records processed successfully', |
| 274 | + ); |
| 275 | + }); |
| 276 | + }); |
| 277 | + |
| 278 | + describe('when notifyMessageProcessor returns undefined', () => { |
| 279 | + it('does not publish submitted event', async () => { |
| 280 | + const sqsEvent = createSqsEvent(1); |
| 281 | + const handler = createHandler(dependencies); |
| 282 | + |
| 283 | + mockParseSqsRecord.mockReturnValueOnce(mockPdmEvent); |
| 284 | + mockSenderManagement.getSender.mockReturnValueOnce(mockSender); |
| 285 | + mockNotifyMessageProcessor.process.mockResolvedValueOnce(undefined); |
| 286 | + |
| 287 | + const result = await handler(sqsEvent); |
| 288 | + |
| 289 | + expect(result).toEqual({ batchItemFailures: [] }); |
| 290 | + expect( |
| 291 | + mockEventPublisherFacade.publishMessageRequestSubmitted, |
| 292 | + ).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| 293 | + }); |
| 294 | + }); |
| 295 | +}); |
0 commit comments