You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: app/posts/manage-breast-screening/2025/09/2025-09-16-capturing-medical-history.md
+8-8Lines changed: 8 additions & 8 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@ In future we'd like to sync the service with existing health data sources, or po
26
26
27
27
Radiographers have told us that at some point between the identity check and x-rays being taken, they will ask participants a broad question such as "Have you had any issues or surgery in your breast or chest area?"
28
28
29
-
The exact way they phrase this question varys widely from clinic to clinic.
29
+
The exact way they phrase this question varies widely from clinic to clinic.
30
30
31
31
The response is recorded on a paper form. They could make a tick, write down a year, or put a 'Y' on one or both sides, and add comments in the space provided. If there is nothing to record, they will typically strike through the section to indicate that the question has been covered.
32
32
33
33

34
34
35
35
### Examples of completed forms
36
36
37
-
These are real forms containing no identifiable participant inforamtion.
37
+
These are real forms containing no identifiable participant information.
38
38
39
39

40
40
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ In the diagram:
81
81
82
82
### Mapping requirements to reality
83
83
84
-
We anayalysed the paperwork from a screening clinic to see what information was most frequently captured. While this only gives a very rough approximation (we plan to analyse more clinics in the coming weeks) it is useful to see that in the majority of appointments, no medical information needs to be recorded.
84
+
We analysed the paperwork from a screening clinic to see what information was most frequently captured. While this only gives a very rough approximation (we plan to analyse more clinics in the coming weeks) it is useful to see that in the majority of appointments, no medical information needs to be recorded.
85
85
86
86
When it was necessary, the topics recorded in our sample clinic were:
87
87
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ There are alternative ways to group these (for example, breast implant removal c
146
146
147
147
Each issue has been turned into a short data collection form which can be accessed from a medical information dashboard.
148
148
149
-
### An example journey for collecting breast cancer infroamtion
149
+
### An example journey for collecting breast cancer information
150
150
151
151
The side-by-side form pattern on the following prototype images is not typical in the NHS design system. We've used it as it matches the way radiographers work, adding information about a participant as they are stood facing them.
152
152
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ The side-by-side form pattern on the following prototype images is not typical i
158
158
159
159

160
160
161
-

161
+

162
162
163
163
.')
164
164
@@ -170,19 +170,19 @@ Radiologists made it clear that dates were only necessary for accessing breast c
170
170
171
171
However, radiographers felt there was a valid need to collect this information. It may not be necessary during this screening episode, but the next time a radiographer is reviewing the information with the participant at a mammogram appointment being able to refer to a year is very useful.
172
172
173
-
We are continuing to test this with users, but the current approach is likely to be an optional 'Year' field on each form. This does bring potential complications (Do we want the treatment date, or the diagnosis date? Is a year too vauge, or would a month be useful too? Do participants take a disproportionate amount of time to answer questions about dates?) but this can be adapted as we gather more feedback.
173
+
We are continuing to test this with users, but the current approach is likely to be an optional 'Year' field on each form. This does bring potential complications (Do we want the treatment date, or the diagnosis date? Is a year too vague, or would a month be useful too? Do participants take a disproportionate amount of time to answer questions about dates?) but this can be adapted as we gather more feedback.
174
174
175
175
## Before and after data collection
176
176
177
-
We've looked at ways to make it easy as possible for users to begin the relevant data collection journey based on what gets mentioned by the participant. This means clear actions that leave no ambiguity about which issue should be recorded where.
177
+
We've looked at ways to make it as easy as possible for users to begin the relevant data collection journey based on what gets mentioned by the participant. This means clear actions that leave no ambiguity about which issue should be recorded where.
178
178
179
179
### The initial design
180
180
181
181
While we were refining the categories, our prototype used the summary list component from the GOV.UK system.
182
182
183
183

184
184
185
-
As well as taking up a large portion of the page, the repetitive nature of this pattern made it difficult for users to quickly scan and make the appropriate selection. The list of links also makes it appear that there is a lot of actions for the user to take, even if the intention is for them to ignore anything irrelevant.
185
+
This pattern takes up a large portion of the page and the repetitive nature of the links made it difficult for users to quickly scan and make the appropriate selection. The list of links also makes it appear that there are a lot of actions for the user to take, even if the intention is for them to ignore anything irrelevant.
0 commit comments