|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: How we responded to the COVID-19 booster confusion |
| 3 | +date: 2025-10-23 |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +**This autumn, as the COVID-19 vaccination programme launched, our digital services team needed to move quickly to respond to confusion around eligibility.** |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Many patients turned up at pharmacies expecting to receive a booster, but had to be turned away. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +We needed to act fast to help reduce pressure on community pharmacies and offer clarity for patients. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +Many of the ineligible people coming forward had likely come through our own booking service, which is intentionally designed to let people self-refer if they believe they are eligible. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Why this confusion happened |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +This year, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) changed eligibility rules for COVID-19 boosters. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +The age threshold rose from **65 to 75**, meaning many people who had qualified last year were no longer eligible. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +[We published guidance on NHS.UK](https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/covid-19-vaccine/) and GOV.UK, but the shift caught many off guard. Here's what some users told us in the booking exit survey (1 Sept to 5 October): |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +> I do not understand why I do not qualify too, especially as I am 67 |
| 25 | +
|
| 26 | +> If something has changed, it would be kind to inform people that they are no longer at significant risk |
| 27 | +
|
| 28 | +## What we did |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +We - Vaccination Digital Services - acted quickly to support patients and pharmacy teams, by: |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +- **sending targeted follow-up messages** to around 250,000 people under 75 with upcoming bookings, explaining the updated eligibility rules and setting expectations |
| 33 | +- **updating confirmation messages** in the booking service to reinforce the change |
| 34 | +- **working with Community Pharmacy England** to create [resources to help pharmacy teams](https://cpe.org.uk/our-news/c-19-vac-eligibility-resources-to-help-pharmacy-teams/) |
| 35 | +- **adding a warning to the** [flu booking start page](https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/vaccination-and-booking-services/book-flu-vaccination/), reminding users to check COVID-19 eligibility before booking |
| 36 | +- **updating national invitations** to make the change in eligibility clearer |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Mindful of the frustration people were feeling, we wanted the tone of our email to reflect that. It was a slight shift from our [usual voice](https://service-manual.nhs.uk/content/voice-and-tone) - more empathetic, more human - and it felt right for the moment: |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +> We understand this might be confusing, especially if you had the vaccine last year. |
| 41 | +
|
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +## What we know |
| 47 | +### Many people go straight for the green button |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +While the COVID-19 vaccination booking service automatically screens out users who are not eligible by age, the [flu vaccination booking service](https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/vaccination-and-booking-services/book-flu-vaccination/) allows users to **self-refer** for a COVID-19 booster if they believe they meet the criteria. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +This is needed because many people want the convenience of arranging both vaccinations in one go - ideally to have at the same appointment. We need to make that process as smooth as possible for those who are eligible. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +We made the criteria as clear as possible, using a prominent yellow [warning callout](https://service-manual.nhs.uk/design-system/components/warning-callout). But it's possible many people simply didn't read this or understand it, or just clicked through anyway. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +> No proper information on eligibility. Just a yes/no question |
| 56 | +
|
| 57 | +> I wanted to see more detail on eligibility criteria |
| 58 | +
|
| 59 | +We're waiting for more data to back this assumption - but this is something researchers see time and again: users skip the content and head straight for the green button — and designers always have to plan for it. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +[We saw this pattern in the COVID testing service too](https://digital.nhs.uk/blog/design-matters/2022/covid-19-testing-tackling-eligibility): once users are familiar with a digital service and have seen an interruption screen before, they're more likely to ignore it, even if content has changed. They assume they've read it before. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +### 'Immunosuppressed' is a grey area |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +But it's likely the confusion wasn't *just* about age. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +Every season, it seems that some patients self-refer believing they have a weakened immune system that qualifies them for the jab - but in fact they do not, or no longer, meet the criteria. For example, someone who recently came off treatment might not realise they're no longer eligible. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +> I’m asthmatic. Got to the time section. Got thrown off. Filled out details and said not eligible. I've had it every year for as long as I remember. |
| 72 | +
|
| 73 | +> I have to rank as very [disappointed] as I find I am not eligible despite a number of health conditions including cardiac, respiratory and diabetes. |
| 74 | +
|
| 75 | +> Incomplete list of immune conditions left me uncertain as to whether I am eligible or not |
| 76 | +
|
| 77 | +It's always a challenge to help people determine whether they have a [weakened immune system because of a health condition or treatment](https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/covid-19-vaccine/), because this is ultimately determined by a clinician. We can't publish a definitive list for people to check agains. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +## What we've learned - and what we'll do next time |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +But let's focus on what we can do. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Now we know: **when eligibility rules change, clarity matters more than ever.** |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +We've learned that: |
| 86 | +- people often don’t read content, especially if they’ve seen similar screens before |
| 87 | +- even well-placed messaging can be missed or misunderstood |
| 88 | +- many people don't know if they qualify for an NHS vaccination |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +And next time, we will: |
| 91 | +- **make it clear that things have *changed***, not just what the new rules are |
| 92 | +- **personalise communications** where possible (e.g. “Because you’re under 75…”) |
| 93 | +- **align national messaging and digital services** more closely to set expectations |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +These lessons will shape how we communicate eligibility in future campaigns, and in the upcoming [Check and book an RSV vaccination service](https://www.service-catalogue.nhs.uk/services/check-my-vaccination-record) in the NHS App, currently in alpha. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +We're constantly learning and improving how we design digital services. As we work to increase uptake of seasonal vaccinations, we also have a responsibility to support those who are no longer eligible - with clear, compassionate communication that helps everyone understand where they stand. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + |
0 commit comments