Skip to content

Commit b73a09d

Browse files
Fix headers
1 parent 80496dc commit b73a09d

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-9
lines changed
  • app/manage-your-appointments/2025/10/pharmacy-visits-what-we-learnt-part-1

1 file changed

+7
-9
lines changed

app/manage-your-appointments/2025/10/pharmacy-visits-what-we-learnt-part-1/index.md

Lines changed: 7 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -7,18 +7,16 @@ We recently visited 10 pharmacies in London to see how they were using MYA just
77

88
We did this research for two main reasons:
99

10-
## 1. To help us better understand the feedback we were receiving
10+
### 1. To help us better understand the feedback we were receiving
1111
We’ve been getting lots of feedback through our feedback survey, in the Q&A during training webinars and via the service desk. This feedback is great for learning what users want and where they’re running into problems, but it’s usually it’s missing the detail required to fully understanding the underlying need.
1212

13-
## 2. To hear from users unlikely to take part in remote research
13+
### 2. To hear from users unlikely to take part in remote research
1414
Up to this point, most of the research on MYA has been remote. This means the sample has skewed towards the kind of users who can easily join a pre-scheduled Teams call. As a result, we’ve heard from lots of back office staff for large pharmacy chains, and people in admin roles for Trusts and PCNs. But, we haven’t heard from as many pharmacists or dispensers as we should have, especially given pharmacies account for roughly 95% of MYA’s users.
1515

16-
# What we learnt
17-
1816
## Different approaches to running seasonal vaccinations
1917
This research helped us get a clearer picture of how pharmacies run their seasonal vaccination services and how, in turn, they set up appointment availability in MYA. Broadly, the pharmacies I visited took one of two approaches.
2018

21-
## A flexible approach
19+
### A flexible approach
2220
The most common approach pharmacies took was to allow bookings at any time and set up their appointment availability to mirror their opening hours. That meant going into MYA, creating a weekly repeating session for Monday – Friday, adding all the vaccination services they offer, and then setting the start and finish times to match opening hours. More often than not the start and ed dates for this covered the whole campaign.
2321

2422
[image of typical availability]
@@ -27,7 +25,7 @@ Pharmacies taking this approach typically had lower demand for both seasonal vac
2725

2826
This also meant they had a relaxed attitude to walk-ins and patients ringing to book an appointment, which they would often just note down in a paper diary. As one pharmacist put it “it’s not go manage your appointments, it’s go with the flow”.
2927

30-
## Less room for manoeuvre
28+
### Less room for manoeuvre
3129
At the other end of the spectrum there was a smaller group of pharmacies who found it more difficult to juggle seasonal vaccinations alongside everything else. These pharmacies typically had a single pharmacist on site, coupled with high demand for other services, like dispensing. This meant they were more worried about falling behind, or becoming overwhelmed, and they were trying to set up MYA in a way that kept things manageable.
3230

3331
Across these sites I saw 3 approaches to this:
@@ -40,15 +38,15 @@ These approaches worked okay, but still felt like ‘workarounds’ with trade-o
4038
## Assumptions challenged
4139
In addition to helping us understand how pharmacies run their services, this research challenged a few unspoken assumptions I think we’d been making.
4240

43-
### Assumption 1: Professionals are more confident with technology
41+
### 1. Professionals are more confident with technology
4442
We assumed that because our users are professionals, with higher level qualifications, they’ll be “tech savvy” and comfortable with more technical language than we might include in a public facing service. In reality, that wasn’t the case. In general, as long as the task was straightforward they were okay, but when things got a little more tricky it caused problems. For example, many pharmacies really struggled to track down the service welcome email using by searching their inbox.
4543

46-
### Assumption 2: They'll read guidance or attend training first
44+
### 2. They'll read guidance or attend training first
4745
We’d assumed staff would attend training or read guidance before using the service. We also thought they’d approach creating availability carefully and methodically, with a mindset more like doing a tax return, than doing online shopping.
4846

4947
In reality pharmacy staff simply don’t have the time for guidance or training beforehand, or to carefully double check everything. Plus, finding time without distractions to do an admin task like this is hard. That means when they get to it, the mindset is to get their appointment availability set up quickly before they get interrupted.
5048

51-
### Assumption 3: Pharmacies run services to the minute
49+
### 3. Pharmacies run services to the minute
5250
We assumed pharmacies deliver most vaccinations at pre-booked time slots, sticking closely to scheduled appointments. At the pharmacies we visited in this research, we found walk-ins were equally, if not more common. My impression was that pharmacies are less concerned with strict timings and more focused on providing a good service overall. If someone turns up early, they may be seen early; if they’re late, it’s usually not a problem.
5351

5452
When you take a step back, none of this is especially surprising. But, without regular research with end users, it’s easy to slip back into self-referential design.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)