Skip to content

Commit d4e7f48

Browse files
Update vaccination eligibility content and response actions
Expanded content to clarify changes in COVID-19 vaccination eligibility and actions taken to inform patients and pharmacy teams. Included user feedback and lessons learned for future communication.
1 parent 863d020 commit d4e7f48

File tree

1 file changed

+94
-1
lines changed
  • app/vaccinations/2025/10/people-just-go-straight-for-the-green-button

1 file changed

+94
-1
lines changed

app/vaccinations/2025/10/people-just-go-straight-for-the-green-button/index.md

Lines changed: 94 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,4 +3,97 @@ title: People just go straight for the green button
33
date: 2025-10-17
44
---
55

6-
Content goes here
6+
**This autumn, as the COVID-19 vaccination programme launched, our digital services team needed to move quickly to respond to unexpected confusion around eligibility.**
7+
8+
We needed to help reduce pressure on community pharmacies and restore clarity for patients.
9+
10+
## What happened
11+
12+
This year, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) changed eligibility rules for COVID-19 boosters.
13+
14+
The age threshold rose from **65 to 75**, meaning many people who had qualified last year were no longer eligible.
15+
16+
[Despite clear guidance on NHS.UK](https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/covid-19-vaccine/) and GOV.UK, the shift caught many off guard. Here's what some users told us in the booking exit survey (1 Sept to 5 October):
17+
18+
19+
> "I do not understand why I do not qualify too, especially as I am 67"
20+
21+
> "If something has changed, it would be kind to inform people that they are no longer at significant risk"
22+
23+
Pharmacies saw a surge in patients who expected to receive a vaccine but were turned away.
24+
25+
This led to frustration and anger - especially among those unaware of the updated rules. It also caused stress and disruption for pharmacy teams, who were already under pressure during a busy period.
26+
27+
![Screenshot of a news headline with the title 'Pharmacies acing angry patients over COVOD-19 jab'](headline.jpg)
28+
29+
## What we did
30+
31+
We - Vaccination Digital Services - acted quickly to support patients and pharmacy teams, by:
32+
33+
- **sending targeted follow-up messages** to around 250,000 people under 75 with upcoming bookings, explaining the updated eligibility rules and setting expectations
34+
- **updating confirmation messages in the booking service** to reinforce the change
35+
- **working with Community Pharmacy England** to create [resources to help pharmacy teams](https://cpe.org.uk/our-news/c-19-vac-eligibility-resources-to-help-pharmacy-teams/)
36+
- **adding a warning to the** [flu booking start page](https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/vaccination-and-booking-services/book-flu-vaccination/), reminding users to check COVID-19 eligibility before booking
37+
- **updating national invitations** to make the change in eligibility clearer
38+
39+
Mindful of the frustration people were feeling, we wanted the tone of our email to reflect that. It was a slight shift from our [usual voice](https://service-manual.nhs.uk/content/voice-and-tone) - more empathetic, more human - and it felt right for the moment:
40+
41+
> “We understand this might be confusing, especially if you had the vaccine last year.”
42+
43+
![Screenshot of the targeted follow-up messages we sent out](comms.png "The follow-up messages we sent, to set expectations")
44+
45+
![Screenshot of the amended booking service start page](flu-start-page.png "Our warning on the flu booking start page")
46+
47+
## What we know
48+
### Many people go straight for the green button
49+
50+
While the COVID-19 vaccination booking service automatically screens out users who are not eligible by age, the [flu vaccination booking service](https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/vaccination-and-booking-services/book-flu-vaccination/) allows users to **self-refer** for a COVID-19 booster if they believe they meet the criteria.
51+
52+
This is needed because many people want the convenience of arranging both vaccinations in one go - ideally to have at the same appointment. We need to make that process as smooth as possible for those who are eligible.
53+
54+
We made the criteria as clear as possible, using a prominent yellow [warning callout](https://service-manual.nhs.uk/design-system/components/warning-callout). But it's possible many people simply didn't read this or understand it, or just clicked through anyway.
55+
56+
> “No proper information on eligibility. Just a yes/no question”
57+
> “I wanted to see more detail on eligibility criteria”
58+
59+
We're waiting for more data to back this assumption - but this is something researchers see time and again: users skip the content and head straight for the green button — and designers always have to plan for it.
60+
61+
![Screenshot of the self-referral screen](NBS.png "Our flu booking service asks users if they’d also like a COVID-19 vaccine. Many eligible people clicked through.")
62+
63+
[We saw this pattern in the COVID testing service too](https://digital.nhs.uk/blog/design-matters/2022/covid-19-testing-tackling-eligibility): once users are familiar with a digital service and have seen an interruption screen before, they're more likely to ignore it, even if content has changed. They assume they've read it before.
64+
65+
### 'Immunosuppressed' is a grey area
66+
67+
But it's likely the confusion wasn't *just* about age.
68+
69+
Every season, it seems that some patients self-refer believing they have a weakened immune system that qualifies them for the jab - but in fact they do not, or no longer, meet the criteria. For example, someone who recently came off treatment might not realise they're no longer eligible.
70+
71+
> "I’m asthmatic. Got to the time section. Got thrown off. Filled out details and said not eligible. I've had it every year for as long as I remember."
72+
73+
> "I have to rank as very [disappointed] as I find I am not eligible despite a number of health conditions including cardiac, respiratory and diabetes."
74+
75+
> "Incomplete list of immune conditions left me uncertain as to whether I am eligible or not"
76+
77+
It's always a challenge to help people determine whether they have a weakened immune system because of a health condition or treatment, because this is ultimately determined by a clinician. We can't publish a definitive list for people to check against, only [a summary](https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/covid-19-vaccine/).
78+
79+
## What we've learned - and what we'll do next time
80+
81+
But let's focus on what we can do.
82+
83+
Now we know: **when eligibility rules change, clarity matters more than ever.**
84+
85+
We've learned that:
86+
- people often don’t read content, especially if they’ve seen similar screens before
87+
- even well-placed messaging can be missed or misunderstood
88+
- many people don't know if they qualify for an NHS vaccination
89+
90+
And next time, we will:
91+
- **convey that things have *changed***, not just what the new rules are
92+
- **personalise communications** where possible (e.g. “Because you’re under 75…”)
93+
- **align national messaging and digital services** more closely to set expectations
94+
95+
These lessons will shape how we communicate eligibility in future campaigns, and in the upcoming [Check and book an RSV vaccination service](https://www.service-catalogue.nhs.uk/services/check-my-vaccination-record) in the NHS App, currently in alpha.
96+
97+
We're constantly learning and improving how we design digital services. As we work to increase uptake of seasonal vaccinations, we also have a responsibility to support those who are no longer eligible - with clear, compassionate communication that helps everyone understand where they stand.
98+
99+

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)