|
101 | 101 |
|
102 | 102 | - **Validate continuously through observability** |
103 | 103 |
|
104 | | - Effective testing does not stop once software reaches production. By integrating observability into testing, teams gain real-time insights and continuously validate system behavior under real-world conditions. Observability-driven testing means using telemetry data, such as metrics, logs, tracing and user analytics, to shape test approach, validate assumptions, detect regressions early and drive continuous improvement. |
105 | | - |
106 | | - - Instrument systems for visibility |
107 | | - - Implement consistent instrumentation (metrics, logs, tracing) across services to capture detailed runtime behavior. |
108 | | - - Ensure telemetry data clearly maps back to business functionality, enabling both technical and business stakeholders to interpret the data. |
109 | | - - Continuous monitoring in production |
110 | | - - Use dashboards and automated alerts to monitor system health continuously, proactively detecting anomalies, performance degradation or unexpected behaviors. |
111 | | - - Regularly verify production health checks and synthetic monitoring results as part of your ongoing testing activities. |
112 | | - - Real-user monitoring (RUM) |
113 | | - - Observe and analyze how real users interact with the system, capturing actual usage patterns, performance characteristics and edge-case scenarios. |
114 | | - - Leverage this data to refine existing automated tests or identify new scenarios worth automating. |
115 | | - - Distributed tracing to inform testing |
116 | | - - Use distributed tracing data (such as OpenTelemetry, AWS X-Ray or Azure Monitor Application Insights) to understand how requests flow through services, identify latency hotspots and pinpoint complex dependency issues. |
117 | | - - Translate tracing insights into targeted integration tests and service-level tests, improving test precision. |
118 | | - - Alerting and proactive issue detection |
119 | | - - Set clear, actionable alerts based on predefined thresholds that matter to users and the business. |
120 | | - - Tie production alerts back into automated test scenarios, ensuring tests reflect actual production conditions and preventing similar issues from recurring. |
121 | | - - Feedback loops into test planning |
122 | | - - Regularly analyze observability data (logs, metrics, user sessions) during sprint planning or retrospectives to identify gaps in testing coverage. |
123 | | - - Treat production incidents as opportunities for testing improvements, each incident should trigger analysis of whether similar risks are sufficiently covered by automated or exploratory tests. |
124 | | - - Testing resilience and failure modes |
125 | | - - Observability supports chaos engineering practices by providing detailed visibility into system behavior under fault conditions. |
126 | | - - Proactively test recovery procedures, failovers and resilience strategies based on observed patterns of failure or degradation from production data. |
| 104 | + Effective testing does not stop once software reaches production. By integrating [observability](observability.md) into testing, teams gain real-time insights and continuously validate system behavior under real-world conditions. Observability-driven testing means using telemetry data, such as metrics, logs, tracing and user analytics, to shape test approach, validate assumptions, detect regressions early and drive continuous improvement. |
127 | 105 |
|
128 | 106 | Applying this principle reduces mean-time-to-detection and recovery, improving reliability, enables teams to validate assumptions using real data rather than guesswork, enhances the quality of future releases by continuously learning from real-world usage patterns. Increases confidence when releasing frequently, knowing production issues can be quickly identified, understood and addressed. |
129 | 107 |
|
|
0 commit comments