Securing Linux Storage with ACLs: An Open-Source Web Management Interface for Enhanced Data Protection #62
Replies: 4 comments
-
|
Hello! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@zeydabadi |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have also asked soo many questions and gotten no responses. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello mentors (@zeydabadi ) and the Emory BMI team, I’m interested in contributing to the “Securing Linux Storage with ACLs” project for GSoC. I’ve spent time understanding the goals and reviewing the technologies involved (Linux ACLs, system-level service design, web frontends with secure backend integration), and I’m currently finalizing my proposal for submission today. I understand that time is short, but I wanted to express my strong interest and share that I’ve started outlining the architecture and system flow, with a focus on: "A lightweight web interface using Flask (or alternative) without external JS dependencies" I’ll also be sharing the proposal with you shortly via the GSoC portal. Any final feedback or guidance, even post-submission, would be deeply appreciated. I’d love the chance to learn and contribute meaningfully to this important security-focused tool. Thank you for considering my application and for offering such a well-thought-out project. Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@zeydabadi
Hi, name is Temi, Rust Engineer | Security Researcher | OpenSource Developer.
I have taken it upon myself to solve this task, and wanted to build out some sort of POC for inclusion with my proposal, so first I wanted to know generally speaking what other authentication modules is required apart from LDAP, and I also wanted to know what would be considered a good MVP or POC per se, a cmdline? minimal GUI with LDAP auth?.
Want to also understand how the application will be deployed, since "eiciel" does not solve the problem, I'm guessing a per-user installation is not how the solution will be used (or is it?), but more like a server-based install ?, which makes me curious as to how it's supposed to then manage ACLs, (network storage perhaps??).
ps: I didn't find out about this early enough that's why it seems I'm reaching out late, as I wasn't expecting to find tasks with Rust oriented solutions under Emory-BMI, but I'm happy I did check 😃, as the challenge falls directly within my skillset.
Profile: all available on GitHub page
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions