Skip to content

[Feature]: Solve the Perf regression test large variance #8391

@MrGeva

Description

@MrGeva

🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch

The test_perf.py regression test shows large variance when run in CI. I see that it runs on two different device types: H100 NVL and H100 PCIE. according to that the perf varies and also the clock frequencies. Need to ability to define threshold per device type if possible, otherwise need to use only one device type by applying a filter in the ci definitions (devops said that they use two device kinds due to machine shortage). see the attached excel chart analyzing the perf variance in correlation to the clock freqs implying difference in perf is due to two different freq levels due to two different device types being used.

test_report_test_perf_metric_token_throughput_llama_v3.1_8b_instruct-bench-_autodeploy-float16-maxbs_512-maxnt_2.csv

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

Before submitting a new issue...

  • Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and checked the documentation and examples for answers to frequently asked questions.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

AutoDeploy<NV> AutoDeploy BackendGeneral perf<NV>Broad performance issues not specific to a particular componentfeature requestNew feature or request. This includes new model, dtype, functionality support

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions