Skip to content

[None][fix] Bypass key-word matching for multimodal tests#9170

Merged
LarryXFly merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:release/1.1from
Wanli-Jiang:user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[None][fix] Bypass key-word matching for multimodal tests#9170
LarryXFly merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:release/1.1from
Wanli-Jiang:user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching

Conversation

@Wanli-Jiang
Copy link
Collaborator

@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang commented Nov 14, 2025

Don't need to mass integrate to main branch.

To fix 1.1 branch faster, we will skip key-word-matching, and only run sanity checking.

It will fix

see test report in https://prod.blsm.nvidia.com/swqa-tensorrt-qa-test/view/TRT-LLM-Function-Pipelines/job/DEBUG_LLM_FUNCTION_TEST/2045/testReport/H100/test_e2e/

Also unwaived the below tests:

Besides that, I also added phi4mm MMMU accuracy tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests

  • Added test coverage for new multimodal model variant with LoRA support
  • Migrated test data from external URLs to local files for improved test stability
  • Adjusted validation thresholds across multimodal test suite

Reference Data

  • Added accuracy baseline metrics (53.67%) for new model configuration

Description

Test Coverage

PR Checklist

Please review the following before submitting your PR:

  • PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.

  • PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.

  • Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)

  • Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities

  • CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes

  • Documentation updated as needed

  • Update tava architecture diagram if there is a significant design change in PR.

  • The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.

  • Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.

GitHub Bot Help

/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...

Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.

Run /bot [-h|--help] to print this help message.

See details below for each supported subcommand.

Details

run [--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id --disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --test-backend "pytorch, cpp" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" --detailed-log --debug(experimental)]

Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.

--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id (OPTIONAL) : Allow the new pipeline to reuse build artifacts and skip successful test stages from a specified pipeline or the last pipeline if no pipeline-id is indicated. If the Git commit ID has changed, this option will be always ignored. The DEFAULT behavior of the bot is to reuse build artifacts and successful test results from the last pipeline.

--disable-reuse-test (OPTIONAL) : Explicitly prevent the pipeline from reusing build artifacts and skipping successful test stages from a previous pipeline. Ensure that all builds and tests are run regardless of previous successes.

--disable-fail-fast (OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.

--skip-test (OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--test-backend "pytorch, cpp" (OPTIONAL) : Skip test stages which don't match the specified backends. Only support [pytorch, cpp, tensorrt, triton]. Examples: "pytorch, cpp" (does not run test stages with tensorrt or triton backend). Note: Does NOT update GitHub pipeline status.

--only-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--disable-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--add-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests in addition to running L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--post-merge (OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx".

--detailed-log (OPTIONAL) : Enable flushing out all logs to the Jenkins console. This will significantly increase the log volume and may slow down the job.

--debug (OPTIONAL) : Experimental feature. Enable access to the CI container for debugging purpose. Note: Specify exactly one stage in the stage-list parameter to access the appropriate container environment. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see docs/source/reference/ci-overview.md
and the scripts/test_to_stage_mapping.py helper.

kill

kill

Kill all running builds associated with pull request.

skip

skip --comment COMMENT

Skip testing for latest commit on pull request. --comment "Reason for skipping build/test" is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

reuse-pipeline

reuse-pipeline

Reuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2025 07:37
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a new test case for Phi-4 multimodal model with fused vision LoRA. It introduces a new test class to the accuracy test suite, adds corresponding reference accuracy data, and registers the test in multiple test lists. It also adjusts test thresholds and replaces external media URLs with local file references in end-to-end tests.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Test Class Addition
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py
Added new test class TestPhi4MMFusedVisionLora extending LlmapiAccuracyTestHarness with model configuration, sampling parameters, KV cache config, and test_auto_dtype() method for MMMU evaluation
Reference Data
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/mmmu.yaml
Added accuracy reference entry for microsoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct with value 53.67
Test List Registrations
tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt, llm_function_l20.txt, llm_function_nim.txt
Registered new test entry accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py::TestPhi4MMFusedVisionLora::test_auto_dtype across three test manifests
End-to-End Test Updates
tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py
Lowered match_ratio thresholds to 0.0 on multimodal and KV-cache tests; replaced external media URLs with local test data file paths (inpaint.png, 61.jpg, video files)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • test_e2e.py: Verify that lowering match_ratio thresholds to 0.0 is intentional and confirm the purpose of disabling accuracy checks for affected multimodal tests. Cross-check that all referenced local media files exist.
  • test_llm_api_pytorch.py: Confirm that TestPhi4MMFusedVisionLora correctly mirrors existing Phi-4 test patterns and that model path and parameters are appropriate.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive PR description lacks structure and clarity; core sections (Description, Test Coverage) are empty, and the initial comment appears incomplete or informal. Fill in the Description section explaining what changes were made and why. Complete the Test Coverage section listing relevant tests. Consider clarifying the statement about not needing to integrate to main branch.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: bypassing key-word matching for multimodal tests, with proper format and no extraneous details.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (4)
tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py (4)

2625-2635: 0% threshold disables accuracy; add minimal sanity checks to prevent false passes

With match_ratio = 0.0, the keyword gate is fully bypassed. If parse_output returns fewer items (or none), zip(...) won’t assert. Add output-count and non-empty checks before looping.

Apply this diff:

 parsed_outputs = parse_output(output)
+expected_count = len(accuracy_inputs[modality]["prompt"])
+assert len(parsed_outputs) == expected_count, (
+    f"Parsed {len(parsed_outputs)} outputs but expected {expected_count}. "
+    "This indicates parsing or generation failed."
+)
+assert all(o and o.strip() for o in parsed_outputs), "Empty generation detected."
 for prompt_output, prompt_keywords in zip(
         parsed_outputs, expected_keywords[model_name][modality]):

3034-3043: Phi‑4MM sanity: add minimal asserts like in image/video tests

Same bypass risk here. Add count/non-empty asserts before the loop.

Apply this diff:

 parsed_outputs = parse_output(output)
+expected_count = len(accuracy_inputs[modality]["prompt"])
+assert len(parsed_outputs) == expected_count, "Parsed outputs count mismatch."
+assert all(o and o.strip() for o in parsed_outputs), "Empty generation detected."
 for prompt_output, prompt_keywords in zip(parsed_outputs,
                                           expected_keywords[modality]):

3142-3153: 2‑GPU MM sanity: assert output count to avoid silent passes

Add the same output-count/non-empty checks here.

Apply this diff:

 parsed_outputs = parse_output(output)
+expected_count = len(accuracy_inputs["image"]["prompt"])
+assert len(parsed_outputs) == expected_count, "Parsed outputs count mismatch."
+assert all(o and o.strip() for o in parsed_outputs), "Empty generation detected."
 for prompt_output, prompt_keywords in zip(
         parsed_outputs, expected_keywords[model_name]["image"]):

3250-3265: Multiturn MM sanity: assert output count and non‑empty generations

Same rationale; prevents false positives when match_ratio = 0.0.

Apply this diff:

 parsed_outputs = parse_output(output)
+expected_count = len(accuracy_inputs["image"]["prompt"])
+assert len(parsed_outputs) == expected_count, "Parsed outputs count mismatch."
+assert all(o and o.strip() for o in parsed_outputs), "Empty generation detected."
 for prompt_output, prompt_keywords in zip(
         parsed_outputs, expected_keywords[model_name]["image"]):
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py (2)

2648-2657: Local media assets: add existence guard to avoid brittle CI failures

Good switch to local files. Guard for missing assets and skip with a clear reason.

Apply this diff near the functionality_inputs definition (right after it):

 functionality_inputs = {
   ...
 }
+# Ensure media files exist; skip gracefully if not present.
+media_files = [p for p in functionality_inputs[modality]["media"] if p]
+missing = [p for p in media_files if not os.path.exists(p)]
+if missing:
+    pytest.skip(f"Missing test media files: {missing}")

2819-2828: Explicit 0.0 thresholds acknowledged

OK to bypass for now; please add a TODO with NVBug IDs and revert plan/date so it’s not forgotten.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d43036e and 9ad6238.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/mmmu.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py (8 hunks)
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_nim.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (8)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: tongyuantongyu
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7781
File: tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt:313-313
Timestamp: 2025-09-17T02:48:52.732Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, `tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt` is specifically for waiving/skipping tests, while other test list files like those in `test-db/` and `qa/` directories are for different test execution contexts (pre-merge, post-merge, QA tests). The same test appearing in both waives.txt and execution list files is intentional - the test is part of test suites but will be skipped due to the waiver.
Learnt from: djns99
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6915
File: cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/cutlass_kernels/moe_gemm/moe_kernels.cu:4010-4012
Timestamp: 2025-08-14T23:23:27.449Z
Learning: For MOE (Mixture of Experts) code reviews in TensorRT-LLM, avoid repeatedly suggesting finalize fusion validation checks and safety assertions. The user djns99 has indicated these suggestions are repetitive and unwanted across multiple MOE-related changes.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learnt from: moraxu
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6303
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/examples_test_list.txt:494-494
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM testing, it's common to have both CLI flow tests (test_cli_flow.py) and PyTorch API tests (test_llm_api_pytorch.py) for the same model. These serve different purposes: CLI flow tests validate the traditional command-line workflow, while PyTorch API tests validate the newer LLM API backend. Both are legitimate and should coexist.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_nim.txt
  • tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py
📚 Learning: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learnt from: fredricz-20070104
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7645
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt:648-648
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test lists, it's common and intentional for the same test to appear in multiple test list files when they serve different purposes (e.g., llm_function_core.txt for comprehensive core functionality testing and llm_function_core_sanity.txt for quick sanity checks). This duplication allows tests to be run in different testing contexts.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_nim.txt
  • tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py
📚 Learning: 2025-08-09T02:04:49.623Z
Learnt from: Fridah-nv
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6760
File: tensorrt_llm/_torch/auto_deploy/models/quant_config_reader.py:81-98
Timestamp: 2025-08-09T02:04:49.623Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM's auto_deploy module, torch.dtype values in configuration dictionaries must be stored as string representations (e.g., "float16" instead of torch.float16) because OmegaConf.merge does not support torch.dtype types. These string representations are converted to actual torch.dtype objects in downstream code.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt
📚 Learning: 2025-09-17T02:48:52.732Z
Learnt from: tongyuantongyu
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7781
File: tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt:313-313
Timestamp: 2025-09-17T02:48:52.732Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, `tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt` is specifically for waiving/skipping tests, while other test list files like those in `test-db/` and `qa/` directories are for different test execution contexts (pre-merge, post-merge, QA tests). The same test appearing in both waives.txt and execution list files is intentional - the test is part of test suites but will be skipped due to the waiver.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_nim.txt
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learnt from: galagam
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6487
File: tests/unittest/_torch/auto_deploy/unit/singlegpu/test_ad_trtllm_bench.py:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, test files (files under tests/ directories) do not require NVIDIA copyright headers, unlike production source code files. Test files typically start directly with imports, docstrings, or code.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt
  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_nim.txt
📚 Learning: 2025-10-20T17:09:21.560Z
Learnt from: nvchenghaoz
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 8469
File: tensorrt_llm/_torch/auto_deploy/transform/library/rms_norm.py:180-182
Timestamp: 2025-10-20T17:09:21.560Z
Learning: In tensorrt_llm/_torch/auto_deploy/transform/library/rms_norm.py, the _gated_rmsnorm_replacement function does not need to cast the output of torch.ops.auto_deploy.torch_rmsnorm_gated back to the input dtype, even though the custom op returns fp32. The dtype handling is managed elsewhere or the fp32 output is acceptable for downstream consumers.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T14:07:45.863Z
Learnt from: EmmaQiaoCh
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7370
File: tests/unittest/trt/model_api/test_model_quantization.py:24-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:07:45.863Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM's CI infrastructure, pytest skip markers (pytest.mark.skip) are properly honored even when test files have __main__ blocks that call test functions directly. The testing system correctly skips tests without requiring modifications to the __main__ block execution pattern.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py (5)
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/accuracy_core.py (4)
  • LlmapiAccuracyTestHarness (844-855)
  • MMMU (384-401)
  • evaluate (184-245)
  • evaluate (763-773)
tests/integration/defs/conftest.py (1)
  • llm_models_root (79-93)
tensorrt_llm/sampling_params.py (1)
  • SamplingParams (126-512)
tensorrt_llm/evaluate/lm_eval.py (2)
  • MMMU (620-666)
  • evaluate (385-417)
tensorrt_llm/llmapi/llm_args.py (1)
  • KvCacheConfig (976-1110)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt (1)

600-601: New accuracy test entry looks correct

Entry for TestPhi4MMFusedVisionLora added consistently. No concerns.

Based on learnings

tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_l20.txt (1)

44-45: Mirrored Phi‑4MM fused LoRA entry in L20 list

LGTM; duplication across lists is intentional for different contexts.

Based on learnings

tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_nim.txt (1)

351-352: NIM list updated with Phi‑4MM fused LoRA

Looks good and consistent with other QA lists.

Based on learnings

tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/mmmu.yaml (1)

5-6: Key usage verified—LGTM

Confirmed the consumer uses the exact key microsoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct to join results. The AccuracyTask.__init__ method performs a direct YAML lookup via .get(model_name, []) where model_name is passed as the test's MODEL_NAME. The added entry matches the key used by TestPhi4MM class and aligns with entries in other reference files (gsm8k.yaml, mmlu.yaml).

tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py (3)

3650-3667: Implementation aligns with PR objectives.

The new test class successfully adds MMMU accuracy testing for the Phi-4 multimodal model with fused vision LoRA, as stated in the PR objectives. The implementation:

  • Follows established patterns from similar VLM test classes (TestQwen2_VL_7B, TestNano_V2_VLM)
  • Properly extends LlmapiAccuracyTestHarness
  • Configures appropriate sampling parameters and KV cache settings
  • Uses the MMMU evaluation task correctly

The structure is sound, pending verification of the specific configuration choices (stop token and resource requirements) noted in previous comments.


3650-3660: Verify the stop token and model path in your test environment.

The new test class follows established patterns in the codebase. However, verification of two items requires manual confirmation:

  1. Stop token "<|USER|>": This differs from other VLM tests (which use "<|endoftext|>"). Confirm this is the correct stop token for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct with fused vision LoRA by checking the model's official documentation or card.

  2. Model path: Verify that {llm_models_root()}/multimodals/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct-fuse-vision-lora exists and is accessible in your test environment before running the test.


3661-3667: Verify if resource decorators are needed for this multimodal test.

The test method at lines 3661-3667 in TestPhi4MMFusedVisionLora currently has no resource decorators. While similar multimodal/VLM tests in the codebase do use decorators:

  • TestQwQ_32B.test_auto_dtype_tp4 uses @pytest.mark.skip_less_device_memory(80000) and @pytest.mark.skip_less_device(4)
  • TestLlama3_1_8B.test_auto_dtype uses @pytest.mark.skip_less_device_memory(32000)

Given that this test uses MAX_NUM_TOKENS=25600 with multimodal evaluation, consider verifying whether resource decorators should be added (e.g., @pytest.mark.skip_less_device_memory(...)) to prevent failures on hardware with limited GPU memory.

@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang force-pushed the user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching branch from 9ad6238 to f2671bf Compare November 14, 2025 09:42
@Wanli-Jiang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24582 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: f2671bf

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24582 [ run ] completed with state FAILURE. Commit: f2671bf
/LLM/release-1.1/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #494 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang force-pushed the user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching branch 2 times, most recently from b177156 to 8eba7ea Compare November 14, 2025 13:03
@Wanli-Jiang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24594 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 8eba7ea

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24594 [ run ] completed with state FAILURE. Commit: 8eba7ea
/LLM/release-1.1/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #495 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@Wanli-Jiang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot run --disable-fail-fast

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24647 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 8eba7ea

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24647 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: 8eba7ea
/LLM/release-1.1/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #498 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang force-pushed the user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching branch from 8eba7ea to ef8ec52 Compare November 17, 2025 04:56
@Wanli-Jiang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot run --disable-fail-fast

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24725 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: ef8ec52

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24725 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: ef8ec52
/LLM/release-1.1/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #500 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang force-pushed the user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching branch from ef8ec52 to 960737b Compare November 17, 2025 08:38
It will fix
* https://nvbugs/5547437
* https://nvbugs/5568836
* https://nvbugs/5591109
* https://nvbugs/5630274

Also unwaived the below tests:
* https://nvbugs/5509024
* https://nvbugs/5444095
* https://nvbugs/5453725

Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
@Wanli-Jiang Wanli-Jiang force-pushed the user/williamj/bypass-keyword-matching branch from 960737b to e84da2a Compare November 17, 2025 08:39
@Wanli-Jiang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot run --disable-fail-fast

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24747 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: e84da2a

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #24747 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: e84da2a
/LLM/release-1.1/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #501 completed with status: 'SUCCESS'

@LarryXFly LarryXFly merged commit 6640aed into NVIDIA:release/1.1 Nov 18, 2025
7 checks passed
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
mikeiovine pushed a commit to mikeiovine/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2025
Signed-off-by: Wanli Jiang <35160485+Wanli-Jiang@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <6158008+mikeiovine@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Iovine <miovine@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants