|
| 1 | +# Voice Agent Best Practices |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Building production-grade voice agents requires careful consideration of multiple dimensions: technical performance, user experience, security, and operational excellence. This guide consolidates best practices and lessons learned from deploying voice agents at scale. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | +## Key Success Metrics |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +- **Latency**: Time from user speech end to bot response start (target: 600-1500ms) |
| 9 | +- **Accuracy**: ASR word error rate (WER), factual correctness, LLM generation quality etc. |
| 10 | +- **Availability**: System uptime and fault tolerance (target: 99.9%+) |
| 11 | +- **User Satisfaction**: Task completion rate and user feedback scores |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +--- |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## 1. Modular and Event-Driven Pipeline Design |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Structure your voice agent as a composable pipeline of independent components: |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +``` |
| 20 | +Audio Input → VAD → ASR → Agent → TTS → Audio Output |
| 21 | +``` |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +Implement event-driven patterns for: |
| 24 | +- Real-time transcription updates |
| 25 | +- Intermediate processing results |
| 26 | +- System health events |
| 27 | +- User interaction events |
| 28 | +- async/await patterns for non-blocking operations |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +**Benefits:** |
| 31 | +- Easy to test and scale individual components |
| 32 | +- Swap providers without full rewrites |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +--- |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +## 2. Optimizing Pipeline Latency |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +For optimizing latency, first we need to measure e2e and component wise latency. Voice agent latency comes from multiple pipeline components. Understanding each contributor enables targeted optimization: |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### 2.1 Audio Processing Latency |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +**Voice Activity Detection (VAD):** |
| 43 | +- **Contribution**: 200-500ms (end of speech detection) |
| 44 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 45 | + - Use streaming VAD with shorter silence thresholds |
| 46 | + - Explore shorter EOU detection with Riva ASR and open-source smart turn detection models |
| 47 | + - Implement adaptive VAD sensitivity based on environment noise |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +**Audio Buffering:** |
| 50 | +- **Contribution**: 50-200ms (network buffering, codec processing) |
| 51 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 52 | + - Use lower latency audio codecs (Opus at 20ms frames) |
| 53 | + - Minimize audio buffer sizes while maintaining quality |
| 54 | + - Implement jitter buffers for network variations |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +### 2.2 ASR (Automatic Speech Recognition) Latency |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +**Model Processing:** |
| 59 | +- **Contribution**: 50-100 ms for Riva ASR |
| 60 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 61 | + - Prefer deploying Riva ASR NIM locally |
| 62 | + - Utilize latest GPU hardware and optimized models |
| 63 | + - Maintain consistent latency performance when handling multiple concurrent requests |
| 64 | + - Use streaming ASR with interim results for early processing |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +### 2.3 Language Model (LLM) Processing Latency |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Model Inference:** |
| 69 | +- **Contribution**: 200-800ms depending on model size and complexity |
| 70 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 71 | + - **Model Selection**: Use smaller, faster models (8B vs 70B parameters) |
| 72 | + - **TRT LLM Optimized**: Use TRT LLM optimized NIM deployments |
| 73 | + - **Quantization**: INT8/FP16 models for 2-3x speedup |
| 74 | + - **KV-Cache Optimization**: Enable KV caching for lower TTFB and optimize based on use case |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +**Context Management:** |
| 77 | +- **Contribution**: 50-200ms for large contexts |
| 78 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 79 | + - Implement context truncation strategies |
| 80 | + - Enable KV caching with adequate cache size |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +### 2.4 TTS (Text-to-Speech) Latency |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +**Synthesis Time:** |
| 85 | +- **Contribution**: 150-300ms for first audio chunk |
| 86 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 87 | + - **Streaming TTS**: Start playback before full synthesis |
| 88 | + - **Local Riva TTS**: 150-200ms with TRT optimized Magpie model |
| 89 | + - **Chunked Generation**: Process sentences as they're generated |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +**Audio Post-processing:** |
| 92 | +- **Contribution**: 50-100ms (normalization, encoding) |
| 93 | +- **Optimization**: |
| 94 | + - Minimize audio processing pipeline |
| 95 | + - Use hardware-accelerated audio codecs |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +### 2.5 Network and Infrastructure Latency |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +- **Geographic Distribution:** Distributed multi-node deployments based on user demographics |
| 100 | +- **Load Balancing:** Use sticky sessions to avoid context switching |
| 101 | +- **Monitoring:** Monitor key metrics in production deployment |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +### 2.6 Advanced Latency Reduction Techniques |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +**Speculative Speech Processing:** |
| 106 | +- Process interim ASR transcripts before speech ends |
| 107 | +- Pre-generate likely responses during user speech |
| 108 | +- **Potential Savings**: 200-400ms reduction in perceived latency |
| 109 | +- For more details, check [docs](SPECULATIVE_SPEECH_PROCESSING.md) |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +**Filler words or Intermediate responses:** |
| 112 | +- Generate or use random filler words to reduce perceived latency |
| 113 | +- For high latency agents or reasoning models, generate intermediate response based on function calls or thinking tokens |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +--- |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +## 3. Designing User Experience |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +### 3.1 Conversation Design Principles |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +**Natural Turn-Taking:** |
| 122 | +- Allow interruptions (barge-in) |
| 123 | +- Implement proper silence handling |
| 124 | +- Use conversational markers ("um", "let me check") |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +**Progressive Disclosure:** |
| 127 | +```python |
| 128 | +# Don't overwhelm with options |
| 129 | +# Bad: |
| 130 | +"You can check balance, transfer funds, pay bills, view history, |
| 131 | +update profile, set alerts, or lock your card. What would you like?" |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +# Good: |
| 134 | +"What would you like to do today?" |
| 135 | +# (Let user guide, offer suggestions if confused) |
| 136 | +``` |
| 137 | +### 3.2 Persona & Tone Consistency |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +**Define Agent Personality:** |
| 140 | +- Professional vs. casual |
| 141 | +- Proactive vs. reactive |
| 142 | +- Verbose vs. concise |
| 143 | +- Empathetic vs. neutral |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +**Maintain Consistency:** |
| 146 | +- Document persona guidelines |
| 147 | +- Use system prompts for LLMs |
| 148 | +- Implement tone checkers |
| 149 | +- Regular quality reviews |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +### 3.3 Voice Selection |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +**Considerations:** |
| 154 | +- Match voice to brand and use case |
| 155 | +- Consider user demographics |
| 156 | +- Regional accent preferences |
| 157 | +- Gender neutrality options |
| 158 | +- Custom IPA dictionary for mispronunciation |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +**Quality Metrics:** |
| 161 | +- Naturalness (MOS score > 4.0) |
| 162 | +- Prosody and intonation |
| 163 | +- Emotional expressiveness |
| 164 | +- Consistency across sessions |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +### 3.4 Response Optimization for Voice |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +**Voice-Specific Adaptations:** |
| 169 | +- Keep responses concise (1-3 sentences per turn) |
| 170 | +- Use conversational language (contractions, simple words) |
| 171 | +- Structure information hierarchically |
| 172 | +- Avoid lists with >3-4 items |
| 173 | +- Use explicit transitions |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +### 3.5 Prompt Design |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +**System Prompt Instructions:** |
| 178 | +- Include persona and tone guidelines directly in the system prompt for consistency |
| 179 | +- Provide clear instructions to avoid outputting formatting (bullet points, markdown, URLs) that doesn't translate to voice |
| 180 | +- Define conversation boundaries and scope to keep interactions focused and prevent rambling |
| 181 | +- Include examples of ideal voice responses in the prompt for few-shot guidance |
| 182 | +- Instructions for Progressive disclosure of options and Context-aware suggestions |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +### 3.6 ASR transcripts quality |
| 185 | +- Implement custom vocabulary boosting for domain terms |
| 186 | +- Use inverse text normalization (ITN) for proper formatting |
| 187 | +- Make sure user audio quality is good |
| 188 | +- Avoid resampling if possible |
| 189 | +- Riva ASR models are robust to noise, skip noise processing |
| 190 | +- Base critical decisions on final transcripts only |
| 191 | +- Finetune ASR model on domain data if needed |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +### 3.7 User-Facing Error Handling |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +**Error Categories:** |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +```python |
| 198 | +ERROR_MESSAGES = { |
| 199 | + "asr_failure": "I didn't catch that. Could you say that again?", |
| 200 | + "service_unavailable": "I'm having trouble connecting. Let me try again.", |
| 201 | + "timeout": "This is taking longer than expected. Please hold on.", |
| 202 | + "out_of_scope": "I'm not able to help with that, but I can help you with..." |
| 203 | +} |
| 204 | +``` |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +**Recovery Strategies:** |
| 207 | +- Offer alternative input methods (DTMF, transfer to human) |
| 208 | +- Provide clear next steps |
| 209 | +- Graceful conversation termination |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | +### 3.8 Continuous testing |
| 212 | +- Implement Unit and Integration Testing |
| 213 | +- Load testing to find bottlenecks for latencies |
| 214 | +- Prepare test data with different conversation scenarios |
| 215 | +- A/B Testing to improve user experience |
| 216 | +--- |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | +## 4. Scalability & Performance |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +### 4.1 Horizontal Scaling |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +**Stateless Services:** |
| 223 | +- Deploy ASR/TTS behind load balancers |
| 224 | +- Use container orchestration (Kubernetes) |
| 225 | +- Auto-scaling based on CPU/memory/queue depth |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +**Stateful Services:** |
| 228 | +- Use Sticky sessions |
| 229 | +- Distributed session storage (Redis) |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +### 4.2 Resource Optimization |
| 232 | + |
| 233 | +**Model Optimization:** |
| 234 | +- Quantization (FP16, INT8) and TRT optimization for inference |
| 235 | +- Smaller models selection for lower footprint |
| 236 | +- Batch inference where possible |
| 237 | +- GPU sharing and multiplexing |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | +### 4.3 Network Optimization |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | +**WebRTC Best Practices:** |
| 242 | +- Use TURN servers for NAT traversal |
| 243 | +- Implement adaptive bitrate |
| 244 | +- Support multiple codecs (Opus preferred) |
| 245 | +- Handle network transitions (WiFi to cellular) |
| 246 | + |
| 247 | +--- |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | +## Conclusion |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +Building production voice agents requires a holistic approach balancing technical performance, user experience, and operational excellence. Key takeaways: |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +1. **Design for Latency**: Every millisecond counts in conversational AI |
| 254 | +2. **Handle Errors Gracefully**: Users should never feel lost |
| 255 | +3. **Monitor Everything**: You can't improve what you don't measure |
| 256 | +4. **Test Thoroughly**: Automated testing catches issues before users do |
| 257 | +5. **Iterate Based on Data**: Use real user feedback to improve |
| 258 | +6. **Plan for Scale**: Design for 10x your current load |
| 259 | +7. **Prioritize Security**: Protect user data as your top responsibility |
0 commit comments