I am trying to diagnose a NaN error I am getting from my Near2Far function. #3089
Unanswered
fumblerful
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
As in, the near fields themselves are NaN? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Github Upload.zip
I am running a script I got from my a colleague but I have modified it a lot. Previous modifications worked fine, but now I am running into an issue where farfield calculations produce NaN. In my diagnosing print commands, it looks like part of my nearfield box is to blame because the first roughly fifth of results are NaN but the rest are fine. I do not know why this is the case because the normal vector for each section of the box looks like it is pointing the right way.
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions