Skip to content

[Improvement] Rework rabbitmq.resources.storageclass parameter to use common storageClass format #21

@andrewluckyguy

Description

@andrewluckyguy

According to deployment parameters https://github.com/Netcracker/qubership-rabbitmq/blob/main/docs/public/installation.md#rabbitmq rabbitmq.resources.storageclass with lowercase c should be used.
It can be misleading, since the generally accepted format assumes using storageClass as specified further for backupDaemon.storageClass parameter

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentationenhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions