Conversion from swc to nml with custom types

[njhulst]

Hi there,

I want to assign different parameter values to different regions of the dendrites and therefore want to split my dendrites into two groups: proximal dendrites and distal dendrites. I used type 8 to indicate proximal dendrites and type 7 to indicate distal dendrites in my swc file. Now if I use neuroConstruct to convert my swc file to an nml file, it seems to go wrong, as the nml file contains segment groups that I cannot identify as the ones I made. For example I have 17 nodes with ID 8 in my swc file, but the nml file contains no segment group that contain 17 nodes. Also, it creates a dendrite group, even though I did not make a dendrite group (none of the nodes has ID 3). My questions:

Am I allowed to split dendrites like this or is it invalid in neuroML?
If it is allowed, what might be going wrong here?

Both files can be found at:
https://github.com/njhulst/IO-temperature-dependence/tree/master/Morphology

[pgleeson]

Have a look here:

neuroConstruct/src/ucl/physiol/neuroconstruct/cell/converters/SWCMorphReader.java

Lines 451 to 488 in d94b86a

	private void addGroups(Segment newSeg, int sectionType)
	{
	switch (sectionType)
	{
	case 0:
	break;
	case 1:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(Section.SOMA_GROUP);
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(somaColourGroup);
	break;
	case 2:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(Section.AXONAL_GROUP);
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(axonColourGroup);
	break;
	case 3:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(Section.DENDRITIC_GROUP);
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(dendColourGroup);
	break;
	case 4:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup("apical_dendrite");
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(dendApicalColourGroup);
	break;
	case 5:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup("custom-1");
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(c1ColourGroup);
	break;
	case 6:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup("custom-2");
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(c2ColourGroup);
	break;
	case 7:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup("custom-n");
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup(c3ColourGroup);
	break;
	default:
	newSeg.getSection().addToGroup("undefined");
	break;

Only point types 0-7 are defined for the neuroConstruct import. Not sure if this is a limitation in the spec itself (documentation on SWC is limited), but if you can use just these values (i.e. not 8) then hopefully what comes out will be closer to what you need...

[njhulst]

Great, that helps, thank you!

[njhulst]

Actually, my segment groups are still not as I would expect. I have custom-1 and custom-2 now, but everything in custom-1 is also in custom-2. And custom-1 is still larger than 17 nodes.

[pgleeson]

So the problem is a bit of a tricky one... the nC import of SWC breaks the list of points into unbranched Sections which are the list of points between where the dendrites split. This is required since these sections are what get mapped to the NEURON sections and the 3D points are added with the pt3d() functions in Neuron, and it's solved with the cable equation in Neuron.

The problem is that some of the points in your swc inside a single unbranched section are 5 and some are 6, e.g. (from neuroConstruct, View cell in 3D and press Cell Info):

so the sections get added to both groups, and so the exported NML has the segments in both segmentGroups

The possible solutions:

1. Change your definitions so the points which are in the proximal groups switch to being in distal group only at branch points
2. Update the swc importer java file to be clever enough to automatically split the section when it sees that it's a new type
3. (long overdue...) Make a pure python reader for SWC that can generate NML2 and is easily extensible (e.g. in here)

[njhulst]

That makes sense, thanks!

[pgleeson]

So FYI for these options:

1. You would need to do this
2. I would probably need to, but it's not on the todo list for now...
3. You could certainly start this off if you felt like it and would be very useful in the longer term if you continue to use SWC & NeuroML...

[MRIO]

Yes indeed, likely useful in the long term, especially if we want to handle the 'continuous cable' directive in a way that allows for heterogeneous channel expression across different simulators. Thanks for your pointer above!

[pgleeson]

@njhulst Ok. If you do plan to go the SWC->NML route via Python (option 3), please do consider making a general purpose one that can go in the pyNeuroML repo. It will be much more useful in the long run for others in the community, rather than the Java/neuroConstruct implementation.

[njhulst]

It is work in progress at the moment, another student has started working on it. We will indeed try and make it general purpose!

[sanjayankur31]

@MRIO @njhulst : would you have access to any code that's been written for this? It's on my TODO list to complete this task, so any existing code would be useful to start from. Cheers

[sanjayankur31]

i ran into this repo, which seems to be a start: https://github.com/WardDPeeters/Morphologies