Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
This sounds like an issue in NeuroConv. I filed catalystneuro/neuroconv#1447 to make sure the NeuroConv team can respond. ChatGPT suggests merging the spike sortings using SpikeInterface, but I am not sure whether that this is the recommended approach with NeuroConv.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I am working on a conversion pipeline for multiprobe neuropixel data. I am using the neuroconv NWBconverter combined with built in data interfaces. When I try to write multiple streams of kilosort data (from each probe), instead of adding to the unit table and specifying the source probe, it overwrites the table with new kilosort data from another probe. Is there another method of converting kilosort data from multiple probes that conserves all the units and specifies which units came from which probe? I tried to follow the documentation on the NeuroConv "How to Link Sorted Data to Electrodes" page, but this documentation is out of date and the listed import doesn't even work (
from neuroconv import SortedRecordingConverter
doesn't work, insteadfrom neuroconv.datainterfaces.ecephys.sortedrecordinginterface import SortedRecordingConverter
). Perhaps I haven't looked hard enough, but are there any examples / guidelines for structuring NWB data for multiple neuropixel probes?Thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions