Removed unnessissary listener removal and re-add

THis made the set to free functuion in the datagram to take tons of CPU.
It is more processor light now.

Author: madhephaestus

javasdk/NRSDK/src/com/neuronrobotics/sdk/common/BowlerDatagram.java

@@ -437,12 +437,19 @@ public void setFree(boolean isFree, BowlerDatagramFactory factory) {
 		setFree(isFree);
 	}
 
+	private void setNotFree(){
+		clear();
+		timeout.stop();
+	}
+	
+	private void setToFree(){
+		timeout.initialize(BowlerDatagramFactory.getPacketTimeout(), this);
+	}
 	void setFree(boolean isFree) {
 		if(isFree== true){
-			clear();
-			timeout.stop();
+			setNotFree();
 		}else{
-			timeout.initialize(BowlerDatagramFactory.getPacketTimeout(), this);
+			setToFree();
 		}
 		this.isPackedAvailibleForLoading = isFree;
 	}

javasdk/NRSDK/src/com/neuronrobotics/sdk/common/ThreadedTimeout.java

@@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ public boolean isTimedOut() {
 	}
 
 	public void initialize(long sleepTime,IthreadedTimoutListener listener) {
-		stop();
-		this.time = (sleepTime);
+		//stop();
 		setStartTime(System.currentTimeMillis());
+		this.time = (sleepTime);
 		setTimeoutListener(listener);
-		timerThread.addTimer(this);
+		//timerThread.addTimer(this);
 	}
 
 	public long getAmountOfTimeForTimerToRun() {
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ public void run(){
 			while(true){
 				if(getTimers().size()>0){
 					toRemove.clear();
+					
 					for(int i=0;i<getTimers().size();i++){
 						try{
 							ThreadedTimeout t = getTimers().get(i);
@@ -112,15 +113,15 @@ public void addTimer(ThreadedTimeout time){
 				if(!getTimers().contains(time))
 					getTimers().add(time);
 			}catch (Exception e){
-					
+				e.printStackTrace();
 			}
 		}
 		public void removeTimer(ThreadedTimeout time){
 			try{
 				if(getTimers().contains(time))
 					getTimers().remove(time);
 			}catch (Exception e){
-				
+				e.printStackTrace();
 			}
 
 		}