Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
No scientific reasons for my cases. As far as I remember there were some mismatches between branches so I did not see the solution to bring them together |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
I think the technical reason was that I needed to bring in an older version for compability reasons with previous versions and then an updated parameterisation that was not accepted in the main version. I should probably have made another branch that branched of from a previous tag. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
There are several beta01 tuning experiments which are using Source Mods instead of branches (#163, #165, #166, #167, #202).
Passing around SourceMods makes it harder to document an experiment and to make it reproducible. It can lead to confusion about what is needed to run a case (e.g., #159) and changes during an experiment are not documented in CaseStatus.
It takes less than a minute to create a branch from a modified source tree and these can be referred to directly in an experiment's issue text.
Is there a science reason to continue using SourceMods instead of documented branches? Please discuss it here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions