Energy conservation in NorESM on Olivia #366
Replies: 4 comments 6 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I plotted the ocean volume temperature from Run8 on Betzy (#338) and on Olivia (#362), and I really don't find any suprising mismatch in #362. Maybe @oyvindseland and @matsbn can add some more clarifying numbers/figures? It seems like the ocean volume temperature in NorESM3 warms even with a slight negative radiative imbalance @ TOA - so that is potentially a mismatch - however the energy budgets from the logs which I have plotted in the figures below seem closed. Apparently the radiative imbalance @ TOA is larger when running Run8 on Olivia and hence the cooling... but please double check these numbers. I must say, given my calculations that £338 seems more "strange" than #362.
Here are figures of the heat budgets from the coupler and also including RESTOM, and a comparison between Run8 on Betzy #338 and Run8 on Olivia #362 For Run8 on Betzy the ocean component is loosing energy and RESTOM is negative, so although the magnitude is somewhat different, I think this is consistent with what we expect For Run8 on Olivia, #362, RESTOM is negative, -0.1074 W/m2 averaged over the length of the simulation. And the ocean is loosing heat on average, but an order of magnitude less. The land is also loosing heat, although that is balanced by glacier. I also made some Hovmoller figures with anomalies from the start of the simulation
For Run8 on Betzy , RESTOM is also slightly negative, I find it to be -0.055 W/m2 averaged over the entire simulation (225 years). The Ocean mean is slightly positive, indicating that the ocean is gaining some heat. Here we see the individual terms in BLOM, with a net positive mean of 0.032 W/m2 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have looked at simulation #362 (period 811-855) and #338 (period 586-810). I compared the warming in the ocean (end year minus begin year), and average TOA flux (over whole period). A negative TOA flux is a flux directed to space.
The result for #338 is worrying : loosing heat at the TOA, but at the same time heating the ocean. Based on these data points, one can derive that if the ocean temperature would be constant, we would still have an imbalance of -0.039 W/m2. I think we had a similar inconsistency in NorESM2 (on the order of 0.05 W/m2, but I don't remember the sign). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm running a comparison of NorESM3 simulations based on the pre-beta12a branch
So far I have only 10 years from Betzy, 20 years from Olivia (Olivia throughput is significantly higher!). The runs are not BFB, as one would expect, and it is probably a bit too soon to conclude if the runs are climatologically equivalent based on the first 10 years. Plan to run 30 years and make new comparison plots. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.







Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is the net budget for area, heat and water after one year on Olivia for run #362
And this is for the last 5 years (861 - 866):
If we compare the budgets to #338 which is the same experiment, but run on Betsy, the numers are very similar
For year 811
For the last 5 years
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions