adjust BVOC observations #69
Description
Looking at the observation-modelled comparison, it seems there is some bias on the coastlines (modelled data > observational data systematically). Probably there is a need to weigh the land cover or check the regridding of observations.
The overestimation of the isoprene emissions can be due to bias in biomass/carbon in those areas from FATES. We could check how it looks weighting on biomass/carbon variables.
