listmonk

Author: pierre-b

src/pages/compare/notifuse-vs-listmonk.astro

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ const proConsRows = [
   {
     label: "Security & Testing",
     notifuse: ">80% test coverage, modern security practices",
-    competitor: "No automated tests, 6+ years of technical debt",
+    competitor: "No automated tests, legacy codebase",
   },
   {
     label: "Visual Tools",
@@ -1039,8 +1039,7 @@ const proConsRows = [
                 > with comprehensive automated tests, ensuring reliability and catching
                 security issues before they reach production. Built with modern,
                 state-of-the-art technologies and security best practices—without
-                the vulnerabilities that often hide in 6+ years of legacy code and
-                technical debt.
+                the vulnerabilities that can accumulate in older legacy codebases.
               </p>
             </div>
 
@@ -1163,7 +1162,7 @@ const proConsRows = [
                 automated tests for all critical functionality, ensuring reliability
                 and catching bugs before they reach production. The codebase is built
                 with modern, state-of-the-art technologies and best practices. Listmonk,
-                while functional, has accumulated 6+ years of technical debt and
+                while functional, is a mature project with a legacy codebase and
                 lacks automated testing, which can lead to more bugs and harder maintenance
                 over time.
               </p>