Obfuscated source is a deal breaker

[TribalInstincts]

I have now spent a good solid two work days evaluating Nova. You've built something really great here. I can confidently say that I would recommend using this going forwarded, if I did not get punched in the face every time I try to extend the tool. Not being able to walk through the source to see where I could safely tap in some new functionality is a real pain. Not being able to walk through the source to fix bugs is a deal breaker. I can not trust that you will be around for the next month, let alone few years to support future use cases or issues.

Please consider deobfuscating your code for paid users. It was honestly shocking to see this compared to any of the other massive (paid) libraries I have used over the years providing full source. I don't think this is protecting your IP as much as you think and it is absolutely costing you wider adoption.

[belgarion01]

I agree with that. There is already a discussion about it here if you want to participate: NovaUI-Unity/Community#34

[TribalInstincts]

Ah - sure enough. I actually saw that when first scoping out the package but didn't realize it was an ongoing discussion. Honestly, if I had read beyond the first sentence, I probably would have moved on and wouldn't be here right now lol. I read "The paid version of Nova does include all Nova source code as raw scripts and is not precompiled" and thought "Ah cool. Lets check it out" and moved on. It wasn't until I was several hours in when I realized that was a pretty misleading sentence. Sure, it calls it out in the same post, but "below the fold".

I'd recommend revising the accepted answer from that post at the least to avoid future misunderstandings.