Add one AER'19 paper. #63
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I missed this, sorry! This one looks social sciency, which I generally avoid adding because there's a ton of these and I prefer to focus on the technical but it also looks interesting and to some extent the social sciences can inform the tech we should be working on. I'll fix the conflict and merge, thanks! |
Thank you for this explanation, @NullHypothesis! I totally agree with you: I usually wouldn't add social sciences paper neither, but this is a very interesting and well-known one. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to Hobbs2018a, Chen2019a attempts to understand circumvention tool users' behaviors.
Ref: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20171765