Skip to content

Commit 06998b8

Browse files
handrewsralfhandl
andauthored
Update versions/3.1.1.md
Co-authored-by: Ralf Handl <[email protected]>
1 parent 1bd77b4 commit 06998b8

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

versions/3.1.1.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@ Extended validation is one way that these constraints MAY be enforced.
27732773

27742774
The `readOnly` and `writeOnly` keywords are annotations, as JSON Schema is not aware of how the data it is validating is being used.
27752775
Validation of these keywords MAY be done by checking the annotation, the read or write direction, and (if relevant) the current value of the field.
2776-
[JSON Schema Validation draft 2020-12 §9.4](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bhutton-json-schema-validation-00#section-9.4) defines the expectations of these keywords, including that resource (described as the "owning authority") MAY either ignore a `readOnly` field or treat it as an error.
2776+
[JSON Schema Validation Draft 2020-12 §9.4](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bhutton-json-schema-validation-00#section-9.4) defines the expectations of these keywords, including that a resource (described as the "owning authority") MAY either ignore a `readOnly` field or treat it as an error.
27772777

27782778
An example of where ignoring a "written" `readOnly` field might be appropriate is a PUT request where the field is included but the value has not been changed, since the alternative of leaving out the field would result in the field's deletion per [[RFC7231]].
27792779

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)