Terms Performance (BT-70) #448
-
Good Morning Lab Making notice subType 18 , although it is CVS valid it lacks the tag :
However I noticed that a similar tag ( NDA ) is so configured : that is with a field with the code and another with the description, while for Terms Performance (BT-70) Bye and thanks ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Thanks for pointing that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The issue described is indeed present in SDK 1.6. As you indicate, there was no field for the This was resolved in SDK 1.7.0, by adding the field OPT-060-Lot, and making it mandatory for notice subtypes 17, 18 and 22 : |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The issue described is indeed present in SDK 1.6. As you indicate, there was no field for the
cbc:ExecutionRequirementCode
withlistName="conditions"
, so the rules requiring the presence of BT-70-Lot were not correctly enforced.This was resolved in SDK 1.7.0, by adding the field OPT-060-Lot, and making it mandatory for notice subtypes 17, 18 and 22 :
See the change at a6e2d0d44#diff-04b1c29add3adb0720b109b3acea38ea110fe7542d1e2786668bc7a8b16cac9cR21542