Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

This is a design option. The listName is not expected for all fields of type code.
Some fields of type code are associated to XML elements of another type (e.g. BT-727-Lot) which therefore do not have a listName attribute.
Regarding BT-702, there are two fields BT-702(a)-notice and BT-702(b)-notice which are associated respectively to an element of type code and an element of type identifier, the second one does not have a listName attribute. Specification of the listName attribute for the first field could have been possible; this does not however provide further relevant information. For consistency between the 2 fields it was decided to not expect the listName attribute for the first f…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by teslavitas
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
fields Related to field metadata (/fields/fields.json) examples business terms Clarifications on business terms
2 participants