Skip to content

Using LINQ Count() on a ConcurrentQueue in every error scenario could be inefficient. Consider maintaining a separate counter or using a more efficient data structure for tracking recent errors. #97

@KyleC69

Description

@KyleC69

Using LINQ Count() on a ConcurrentQueue in every error scenario could be inefficient. Consider maintaining a separate counter or using a more efficient data structure for tracking recent errors.

Originally posted by @Copilot in #96 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions