Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Good point @kedder. This is especially confusing as it applies to an issuance object, e.g. the Stock Issuance object
I suggest changing the description of "security_id"

Instead of simply:

"Identifier for the security which the transaction applies to"

We can bolster this up to better describe the intended usage of this field as so:

"Identifier for the security (stock, plan security, warrant, or convertible) by which it can be referenced by other transaction objects. Note that while this identifier is created with an issuance object, it should be different than the issuance object's id field which identifies the issuance transaction object itself. All future transactions on the security (e.…

Replies: 1 comment 4 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
4 replies
@kedder
Comment options

kedder Mar 2, 2022
Collaborator Author

@jacobyavis
Comment options

@kedder
Comment options

kedder Mar 3, 2022
Collaborator Author

@JSv4
Comment options

JSv4 Mar 27, 2022
Maintainer

Answer selected by kedder
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #100 on March 01, 2022 17:34.