You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/set-theory/spine/recursion.tex
+3-2Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
37
37
The empty function is trivially an $\emptyset$-approximation.
38
38
39
39
If $g$ is a $\gamma$-approximation, then $g \cup
40
-
\{\tuple{\ordsucc{\gamma}, \tau(g)}\}$ is a $\ordsucc{\gamma}$-approximation.
40
+
\{\tuple{\gamma, \tau(g)}\}$ is a $\ordsucc{\gamma}$-approximation.
41
41
42
42
If $\gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $g_\delta$ is a $\delta$-approximation for all $\delta < \gamma$, let $g = \bigcup_{\delta\in\gamma} g_\delta$. This
43
43
is a function, since our various $g_\delta$s agree on all values. And
@@ -127,4 +127,5 @@
127
127
Now, to vindicate \olref[valpha]{defValphas}, just take $A
128
128
= \emptyset$ and $\tau(x) = \Pow{x}$ and $\theta(x) = \bigcup x$. At long last, this vindicates the definition of the $V_\alpha$s!{}
0 commit comments