|
| 1 | +# Threat Model |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Assets |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +- Integrity and authenticity of OpenPRoT firmware |
| 6 | +- Integrity and authorization of cryptographic operations |
| 7 | +- Integrity of anti-rollback counters |
| 8 | +- Integrity and confidentiality of symmetric keys managed by OpenPRoT |
| 9 | +- Integrity and confidentiality of private asymmetric keys |
| 10 | +- Integrity of boot measurements |
| 11 | +- Integrity and authenticity of firmware update payloads |
| 12 | +- Integrity and authenticity of OpenPRoT policies |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## Attacker Profile |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +The attack profile definition is based on the JIL Application of Attack |
| 17 | +Potential to Smartcards and Similar Devices Specification version 3.2.1. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +- **Type of access**: physical, remote |
| 20 | +- **Attacker Proficiency Levels**: expert, proficient, laymen |
| 21 | +- **Knowledge of the TOE**: public (open source), critical for signing keys |
| 22 | +- **Equipment**: none, standard, specialized, bespoke |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### Attacks within Scope |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +See the JIL specification for examples of attacks. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +- Physical attacks |
| 29 | +- Perturbation attacks |
| 30 | +- Side-channel attacks |
| 31 | +- Exploitation of test features |
| 32 | +- Attacks on RNG |
| 33 | +- Software attacks |
| 34 | +- Application isolation |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +## Threat Modeling |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +To provide a transparent view of the security posture for a given OpenPRoT + |
| 39 | +hardware implementation, integrators are required to perform a threat modeling |
| 40 | +analysis. This analysis must evaluate the specific implementation against the |
| 41 | +assets and attacker profile defined in this document. |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +The results of this analysis must be documented in table format, with the |
| 44 | +following columns: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +- **Threat ID**: Unique identifier which can be referenced in documentation and |
| 47 | + security audits |
| 48 | +- **Threat Description**: Definition of the attack profile and potential attack. |
| 49 | +- **Target Assets**: List of impacted assets |
| 50 | +- **Mitigation(s)**: List of countermeasures implemented in hardware and/or |
| 51 | + software to mitigate the potential attack |
| 52 | +- **Verification**: Results of verification plan used to gain confidence in the |
| 53 | + mitigation strategy. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +Integrators should use the JIL specification as a guideline to identify relevant |
| 56 | +attacks and must detail the specific mitigation strategies implemented in their |
| 57 | +design. The table must be populated for the target hardware implementation to |
| 58 | +allow for a comprehensive security review. |
0 commit comments