Adds summary of the discussions

Author: dbosk

course-proposal/contents.tex

@@ -327,49 +327,27 @@ \section{Discussion}
 \end{frame}
 
 
-%%% REFERENCES %%%
-
-\begin{frame}[allowframebreaks]
-  \printbibliography
-\end{frame}
-
-
-
-\mode<all>{\endinput}
-
-
+\subsection{Summary}
 
 \begin{frame}
   \begin{itemize}
-    \item \cite[\S\S 4--5]{SecurityAsAScience}
+    \item MOOC can be heavy to develop.
+    \item Emphasis on practice: why are methods working, why can't we say more 
+      about a result?
+    \item How is the progression compared to the \enquote{normal} methodology  
+      course?
+      \begin{itemize}
+        \item What is the added value?
+      \end{itemize}
+    \item Target audience? Half-way through students?
+    \item 20+ students said they wanted such a course.
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
-\dots
 
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{itemize}
-    \item \textcquote{SecurityAsAScience}
-      {We find that aspects from the philosophy of science on which most other 
-        communities have reached consensus appear surprisingly little used in 
-      security.}
-
-    \item \textcquote{SecurityAsAScience}{%
-        A significant component of security is engineering; this shares with 
-        science the regular contact with, and feedback from, observation, 
-        despite not having as clearly articulated definition or methods.%
-      }
-  \end{itemize}
-\end{frame}
+%%% REFERENCES %%%
 
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{itemize}
-    \item \textcquote{SecurityAsAScience}{%
-        Probably the most significant settled point in the philosophy of 
-        science is that inductive and deductive statements constitute different 
-        types of knowledge claims.%
-      }
-  \end{itemize}
+\begin{frame}[allowframebreaks]
+  \printbibliography
 \end{frame}
 
-