Skip to content

Conversation

@1-Bart-1
Copy link
Member

@1-Bart-1 1-Bart-1 commented Jun 8, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.21%. Comparing base (1fe111b) to head (da0e7c0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #197   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.21%   87.21%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        1784     1784           
=======================================
  Hits         1556     1556           
  Misses        228      228           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ufechner7
Copy link
Member

What should be the advantage of this change? If I want to switch the Julia version, I can just use juliaup default 1.11 or whatever, which then also works if I want to start julia without sysimage using julia --version.

@1-Bart-1
Copy link
Member Author

1-Bart-1 commented Jun 9, 2025

Main advantage: creating two system images for two different julia versions at the same time. In addition it is more convenient to write.

@1-Bart-1
Copy link
Member Author

julaup default 1.10 sets julia to version 1.10 on the whole system, and I am working on multiple branches at the same time: when building a system image and xz file I want to continue working on a different branch.

@ufechner7
Copy link
Member

Not planned.

@ufechner7 ufechner7 closed this Jul 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants